On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 01:24:01PM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote:
>
> Herbert, did you manage to reproduce the problem meanwhile? If so, was
> there any progress on fixing rhashtable? Otherwise, I could respin my
> patch from [1] to cover only -EBUSY case by default and add a parameter
> to make non-per
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 01:14:18PM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
> when I use rhashtable_lookup_insert_key, sometimes it will return -EBUSY.
> im not sure if there is a good way to workabout it.
> or I should just try again and again until it's inserted successfully ?
>
> I have seen some use in kernel
when I use rhashtable_lookup_insert_key, sometimes it will return -EBUSY.
im not sure if there is a good way to workabout it.
or I should just try again and again until it's inserted successfully ?
I have seen some use in kernel by now, but it seems that no one consider
this issue for their cases