Re: slab-nomerge (was Re: [git pull] device mapper changes for 4.3)

2015-09-07 Thread Jesper Dangaard Brouer
On Mon, 7 Sep 2015 13:22:13 -0700 Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 2:30 AM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer > wrote: > > > > The slub allocator have a faster "fastpath", if your workload is > > fast-reusing within the same per-cpu page-slab, but once the workload > > increases you hit the s

Re: slab-nomerge (was Re: [git pull] device mapper changes for 4.3)

2015-09-07 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 2:30 AM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > > The slub allocator have a faster "fastpath", if your workload is > fast-reusing within the same per-cpu page-slab, but once the workload > increases you hit the slowpath, and then slab catches up. Slub looks > great in micro-benchma

Re: slab-nomerge (was Re: [git pull] device mapper changes for 4.3)

2015-09-07 Thread Jesper Dangaard Brouer
On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 20:51:09 -0700 Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 8:26 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: > > > > The double standard is the problem here. No notification, proof, > > discussion or review was needed to turn on slab merging for > > everyone, but you're setting a very high ba