Re: syzcaller patch postings...

On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 3:35 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: Dmitry Vyukov > Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 10:58:07 +0100 > >> Do I understand it correctly that if syzbot replies to the CC list >> that was in the testing request, it will resolve the problem? So

Re: syzcaller patch postings...

Dmitry Vyukov writes: > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 3:35 PM, David Miller wrote: >> From: Dmitry Vyukov >> Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 10:58:07 +0100 >> >>> Do I understand it correctly that if syzbot replies to the CC list >>> that was in

Re: syzcaller patch postings...

On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 3:35 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: Dmitry Vyukov > Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 10:58:07 +0100 > >> Do I understand it correctly that if syzbot replies to the CC list >> that was in the testing request, it will resolve the problem? So

Re: syzcaller patch postings...

On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 3:16 PM, Daniel Axtens wrote: > Dmitry Vyukov writes: > >> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 2:31 PM, Daniel Axtens wrote: >>> Dmitry Vyukov writes: >>> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 9:26 AM, Paolo Abeni

Re: syzcaller patch postings...

From: Dmitry Vyukov Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 10:58:07 +0100 > Do I understand it correctly that if syzbot replies to the CC list > that was in the testing request, it will resolve the problem? So if > netdev wasn't in CC, it will not be added to CC. > > I will go and fix it

Re: syzcaller patch postings...

Dmitry Vyukov writes: > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 2:31 PM, Daniel Axtens wrote: >> Dmitry Vyukov writes: >> >>> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 9:26 AM, Paolo Abeni wrote: On Wed, 2018-02-21 at 16:47 -0500, David Miller

Re: syzcaller patch postings...

On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 2:31 PM, Daniel Axtens wrote: > Dmitry Vyukov writes: > >> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 9:26 AM, Paolo Abeni wrote: >>> On Wed, 2018-02-21 at 16:47 -0500, David Miller wrote: I have to mention this now before it

Re: syzcaller patch postings...

Dmitry Vyukov writes: > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 9:26 AM, Paolo Abeni wrote: >> On Wed, 2018-02-21 at 16:47 -0500, David Miller wrote: >>> I have to mention this now before it gets out of control. >>> >>> I would like to ask that syzkaller stop posting the

Re: syzcaller patch postings...

On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 11:03 AM, Florian Westphal wrote: > Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 9:26 AM, Paolo Abeni wrote: >> > On Wed, 2018-02-21 at 16:47 -0500, David Miller wrote: >> >> I have to mention this now before it

Re: syzcaller patch postings...

Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 9:26 AM, Paolo Abeni wrote: > > On Wed, 2018-02-21 at 16:47 -0500, David Miller wrote: > >> I have to mention this now before it gets out of control. > >> > >> I would like to ask that syzkaller stop posting

Re: syzcaller patch postings...

On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 9:26 AM, Paolo Abeni wrote: > On Wed, 2018-02-21 at 16:47 -0500, David Miller wrote: >> I have to mention this now before it gets out of control. >> >> I would like to ask that syzkaller stop posting the patch it is >> testing when it posts to netdev. >

Re: syzcaller patch postings...

On Wed, 2018-02-21 at 16:47 -0500, David Miller wrote: > I have to mention this now before it gets out of control. > > I would like to ask that syzkaller stop posting the patch it is > testing when it posts to netdev. There is an open issue on this topic:

Re: syzcaller patch postings...

David Miller wrote: > I have to mention this now before it gets out of control. > > I would like to ask that syzkaller stop posting the patch it is > testing when it posts to netdev. Same for netfilter-devel. I could not get a reproducer to trigger and asked syzbot to test

syzcaller patch postings...

I have to mention this now before it gets out of control. I would like to ask that syzkaller stop posting the patch it is testing when it posts to netdev. This creates a lot of confusion and I have to manually change the status in patchwork of every patch syzcaller posts in this way. I would