From: Sridhar Samudrala [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 15:46:12 -0700
Please apply the following 6 SCTP patches to 2.6 tree.
Sridhar, I missed the 2.6.17 release but I will be sure
to queue these up for the first 2.6.17.x stable release.
Sorry about that.
-
To unsubscribe from this
Hi,
I added one file (include/linux/selinux.h) which was omitted from the
previous patch, and removed a couple of unnecessary changes.
Again, comments are welcome!
thanks,
Catherine
--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This patch implements an API whereby an application can determine the
label of
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006, Catherine Zhang wrote:
Patch purpose:
This patch enables a security-aware application to retrieve the
security context of the peer of a Unix datagram socket. The application
can then use this security context to determine the security context for
processing on
On Sunday 18 June 2006 05:01, Dan Williams wrote:
On Fri, 2006-06-16 at 20:50 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
I recently patched softmac to enable shared key authentication. This small
patch
will enable crazy or unfortunate bcm43xx users to use this new capability.
Meaning that _until now_,
From: Michael Buesch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: bastard operater [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: recommend a network card
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2006 23:23:01 +0200
On Saturday 17 June 2006 23:12, bastard operater wrote:
People on
On Sunday 18 June 2006 17:28, bastard operater wrote:
I never had a malfunctioning NIC. What does it look like?
Broken packages?
It loses its network connection (the systems says the card is unplugged) for
a second or two and then the connection comes back. Sometimes the
connection just
From: Michael Buesch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: bastard operater [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: recommend a network card
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 17:48:55 +0200
On Sunday 18 June 2006 17:28, bastard operater wrote:
I never had a malfunctioning NIC. What does it look like?
This patch adds support for the smc91x on the LogicPD PXA270 to
the smc91x driver.
Signed-off-by: Lennert Buytenhek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
This patch was previously submitted on March 28, but doesn't seem
to have made it into 2.6.17.
Index: linux-2.6.17/drivers/net/smc91x.h
Hi,
sorry for the delayed response...
On 13/06/06 00:29, Francois Romieu wrote:
wget goes faster, right ? Do you have some vmstat 1 output at hand
for it ?
It does indeed go faster, and it seems a little bit more reliable, but
with big enough transfers it locks up too. See commandline-2.txt
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 11:02:02PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is missing ?
-
The routes are not yet isolated, that implies:
- binding to another container's address is allowed
- an outgoing packet which has an unset source address can
potentially get
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 11:02:04PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ read_lock(dev_base_lock);
+
+ for (dev = dev_base; dev; dev = dev-next)
+ if (!strncmp(dev-name, devname, IFNAMSIZ))
+ break;
+
+ if (!dev) {
+ ret = -ENODEV;
+
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 11:02:05PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
struct net_device *dev_get_by_name(const char *name)
{
+ struct net_ns_dev_list *dev_list = (net_ns()-dev_list);
struct net_device *dev;
- read_lock(dev_base_lock);
+ read_lock(dev_list-lock);
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
Does this fix it?
# sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_abc=0
Thanks for the suggestion. I will give it a try later tonight. Also Andrew -
sorry for the incorrect placement of my follow-up comments. I do appreciate
everyone's help in figuring this out.
--
Dr. Harry
After running 2.6.17rc6 with device scape stack
(git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-dev.git)
for a few hours, my system hangs. Here is the last thing I see in my logs:
[4323255.189000] NETDEV WATCHDOG: wmaster0: transmit timed out
[4323255.189000] wmaster0: resetting
--- Alex Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After running 2.6.17rc6 with device scape stack
(git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-dev.git)
for a few hours, my system hangs. Here is the last thing I see in my logs:
[4323255.189000] NETDEV WATCHDOG: wmaster0: transmit
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 03:38:39PM +0400, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
I think, yes. Al Viro is sitting on terabytes of endian annotations in
networking code. See net-endian.b* branches at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/bird.git
I don't know if he considers them ready.
I do not.
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 04:14:06PM -0700, David S. Miller ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
From: Evgeniy Polyakov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 12:40:45 +0400
Some external patches, which can be built both as static build and as
module just check that value, and thus will fail with
17 matches
Mail list logo
