[PATCH] xfrm: do not use large arrays in BSS

2005-08-07 Thread Balazs Scheidler
Hi, Commit log says it all. Signed-off-by: Balazs Scheidler [EMAIL PROTECTED] diff-tree a262e285077cb1604c25c5de99d71bbf739823e2 (from 684a28105211367d9040ee945cead597912cc49e) Author: Balazs Scheidler [EMAIL PROTECTED](none) Date: Sun Aug 7 20:23:59 2005 +0200 As discussed [1

Re: [PATCH] xfrm: do not use large arrays in BSS

2005-08-11 Thread Balazs Scheidler
On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 16:27 +0200, Balazs Scheidler wrote: Is this tiny patchlet worth the trouble of changing xfrm_init/xfrm_state_init to return int, and do error checking from ip_rt_init() ? I've attached a revised patch, this time with complete error checking, and propagating the error

Re: [PATCH] xfrm: do not use large arrays in BSS

2005-08-11 Thread Balazs Scheidler
On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 22:31 +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: Balazs Scheidler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've attached a revised patch, this time with complete error checking, and propagating the error code to the caller. Please apply. Sorry, but it seems that you've left out the bits that check

Re: [PATCH] xfrm: do not use large arrays in BSS

2005-08-11 Thread Balazs Scheidler
On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 14:44 +0200, Balazs Scheidler wrote: On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 22:31 +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: Balazs Scheidler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've attached a revised patch, this time with complete error checking, and propagating the error code to the caller. Please

[PATCH] move XFRM state tables from bss to dynamically allocated pages

2005-08-13 Thread Balazs Scheidler
Hi, Against latest net-2.6.14, but should apply to other versions as well. Please apply. diff-tree b13ca94bb73c79cbc1b34c4261b02c3df934498a (from c097bee59e15d4703e53b8c21d9e9ce5da9365bc) Author: Balazs Scheidler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat Aug 13 16:24:25 2005 +0200 As discussed [1

Re: [PATCH/RFC 01/10] Implement local diversion of IPv4 skbs

2007-01-10 Thread Balazs Scheidler
On Wed, 2007-01-10 at 07:46 +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote: KOVACS Krisztian wrote: + rth-u.dst.lastuse = jiffies; + dst_hold(rth-u.dst); + rth-u.dst.__use++; + RT_CACHE_STAT_INC(in_hit); +

Re: [NETFILTER] NAT sequence adjustment: Save eight bytes per conntrack

2006-01-31 Thread Balazs Scheidler
On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 00:22 +0100, Harald Welte wrote: --- commit 94d3d40c84672b74e59ea5252f61602610e1513e tree 63e5ae5174af9f982be6d8d1bbe11e750e4ace32 parent e3c7a1f99300fbd6de35a40fcd9c4dc1b0fbfee2 author Harald Welte [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri, 27 Jan 2006 16:03:45 +0100 committer Harald

[patch] RFC: matching interface groups

2006-08-01 Thread Balazs Scheidler
Hi, I would like to easily match a set of dynamically created interfaces from my packet filter rules. The attached patch forms the basis of my implementation and I would like to know whether something like this is mergeable to mainline. The use-case is as follows: * I have two different

Re: [patch] RFC: matching interface groups

2006-08-02 Thread Balazs Scheidler
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 21:18 +0200, Sven Schuster wrote: Hi Phil, On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 11:46:55AM -0700, Phil Oester told us: Since in this scenario userspace is able to determine ppp vs pptp, could you not also do something like have an inbound_ppp and inbound_pptp chain, then jump

Re: [patch] RFC: matching interface groups

2006-08-02 Thread Balazs Scheidler
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 11:29 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: On Tue, 01 Aug 2006 19:10:09 +0200 Balazs Scheidler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I would like to easily match a set of dynamically created interfaces from my packet filter rules. The attached patch forms the basis of my

Re: [patch] RFC: matching interface groups

2006-08-03 Thread Balazs Scheidler
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 21:08 -0700, Stephen J. Bevan wrote: Balazs Scheidler writes: I would like to easily match a set of dynamically created interfaces from my packet filter rules. The attached patch forms the basis of my implementation and I would like to know whether something like

Re: [patch] RFC: matching interface groups

2006-08-07 Thread Balazs Scheidler
On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 12:06 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote: Balazs Scheidler wrote: The use-case is as follows: * I have two different subsystems creating interfaces dynamically (for example pptpd and serial pppd lines, each creating dynamic pppX interfaces), * I would like to assign

Re: [PATCHv6 0/3] Interface group patches

2007-11-21 Thread Balazs Scheidler
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 01:25 +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote: David Miller wrote: From: Laszlo Attila Toth [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:52:12 +0100 Jan Engelhardt írta: On Nov 20 2007 14:14, Laszlo Attila Toth wrote: This is the 6th version of our interface group patches.

Re: cassini driver skb-truesize bug

2007-12-05 Thread Balazs Scheidler
Some more investigation revealed that the cassini driver leaks the data portion of all RXed packets, this makes the driver completely unusable. We've tested the following combinations: * 2.6.17 (patched, but no cassini related patches) * 2.6.22 Ubuntu Gutsy. It still worked in 2.6.12 where we

Re: [PATCH 0/0]: Cassini bug fixes.

2008-01-04 Thread Balazs Scheidler
On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 00:32 -0800, David Miller wrote: Over the past day I've put together the following set of bug fixes for the Cassini driver. At least with my setup it appears to basically work fine, not leak memory, and the SKB BUG messages go away too. I'll be honest and say that