From: Rao Shoaib
For AF_UNIX stream socket send SIGURG to the peer if
the msg has MSG_OOB flag set.
Signed-off-by: Rao Shoaib
---
net/unix/af_unix.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c
index 92784e5..4f01d74 100644
From: Rao Shoaib
The use of AF_UNIX sockets is on the rise. We have a case where thousands
of processes connect locally to a database and issue queries that are
serviced by a pool of threads. Communication is done over AF_UNIX
sockets. Currently, there is no way for the submitter to signal the
On 03/19/2018 07:44 PM, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
From: Ilya Lesokhin
Called when a TCP segment is acknowledged.
Could be used by application protocols who hold additional
metadata associated with the stream data.
This is required by TLS device offload to release
metadata associated with acknowl
On 03/21/2018 04:21 AM, Boris Pismenny wrote:
On 3/20/2018 10:36 PM, Rao Shoaib wrote:
On 03/19/2018 07:44 PM, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
From: Ilya Lesokhin
Called when a TCP segment is acknowledged.
Could be used by application protocols who hold additional
metadata associated with the
I am new to Linux. I would like to understand the rules and etiquettes
of engaging with the community. I have read the materials that I could
find. As I work with Linux I come across situations for which I can not
seem to find any answers. Hopefully folks on the list can answer them.
* Submitt
I am working on a change which introduces a couple of indirect function
calls in the fast path. I used indirect function calls instead of
"if/else" as it keeps the code cleaner and more readable and provides
for extensibility.
I do not expect any measurable overhead as modern CPU's use pre-fet
little different behavior is desired it can be achieved and
common code could still be shared. Of course you can not say much
without looking at the code but will you even entertain such a change ?
Regards,
Rao.
On 03/06/2018 08:43 PM, David Miller wrote:
From: Rao Shoaib
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018
On 03/06/2018 10:32 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Tue, 2018-03-06 at 21:53 -0800, Rao Shoaib wrote:
David,
Thanks a lot for your prompt response. Do you have a specific
solution
in mind or will the calls be replaced with simple checks ?
There is upcoming work for that, but not specific to TCP
From: Rao Shoaib
For AF_UNIX stream socket send SIGURG to the peer if
the msg has MSG_OOB flag set.
Signed-off-by: Rao Shoaib
---
net/unix/af_unix.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c
index 92784e5..4f01d74 100644
From: Rao Shoaib
The use of AF_UNIX sockets is on the rise. We have a case where thousands
of processes connect locally to a database and issue queries that are
serviced by a pool of threads. Communication is done over AF_UNIX
sockets. Currently, there is no way for the submitter to signal the
From: Rao Shoaib
This enhancement auto loads transport module when the transport
is set via SO_RDS_TRANSPORT socket option.
Reviewed-by: Ka-Cheong Poon
Reviewed-by: Håkon Bugge
Signed-off-by: Rao Shoaib
Signed-off-by: Somasundaram Krishnasamy
---
include/uapi/linux/rds.h | 4 +++-
net/rds
From: Rao Shoaib
In testing with mprds enabled, Oracle Cluster nodes after reboot were
not able to communicate with others nodes and so failed to rejoin
the cluster. Peers with lower IP address initiated connection but the
node could not respond as it choose a different path and could not
On 6/26/20 4:31 PM, David Miller wrote:
From: rao.sho...@oracle.com
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 11:34:38 -0700
+/* Check connectivity of all paths
+ */
+void rds_check_all_paths(struct rds_connection *conn)
+{
+ int i = 0;
+
+ do {
+ rds_conn_path_connect_if_down(&conn->c
From: Rao Shoaib
This enhancement auto loads transport module when the transport
is set via SO_RDS_TRANSPORT socket option.
Orabug: 31032127
Reviewed-by: Ka-Cheong Poon
Reviewed-by: Håkon Bugge
Signed-off-by: Rao Shoaib
Signed-off-by: Somasundaram Krishnasamy
---
include/uapi/linux/rds.h
On 5/29/20 4:41 PM, David Miller wrote:
From: rao.sho...@oracle.com
Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 01:17:42 -0700
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/rds.h b/include/uapi/linux/rds.h
index cba368e55863..7273c681e6c1 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/rds.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/rds.h
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@
On 5/31/20 3:08 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 01:17:42AM -0700, rao.sho...@oracle.com wrote:
From: Rao Shoaib
This enhancement auto loads transport module when the transport
is set via SO_RDS_TRANSPORT socket option.
Orabug: 31032127
I think that it is internal to
On 6/1/20 11:17 PM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 09:59:30AM -0700, Rao Shoaib wrote:
On 5/29/20 4:41 PM, David Miller wrote:
From: rao.sho...@oracle.com
Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 01:17:42 -0700
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/rds.h b/include/uapi/linux/rds.h
index
From: Rao Shoaib
In testing with mprds enabled, Oracle Cluster nodes after reboot were
not able to communicate with others nodes and so failed to rejoin
the cluster. Peers with lower IP address initiated connection but the
node could not respond as it choose a different path and could not
I am looking at a system which is configured for IPv6 only but sits in a
network that serves both IPv4 and IPv6. When an IPv4 packet with a
destination broadcast address is sent out (in this case DHCP) the
system accepts it and since it does not have any route to the sender it
prints the Marti
Signed-off-by: Rao Shoaib
---
net/ipv4/tcp.c | 10 --
net/ipv4/tcp_timer.c | 9 +
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
index 71ce33d..f2af44d 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
@@ -2628,7 +2628,9
than that of the adopted USER TIMEOUT.
This patch enforces the MUST and also dis-associates user timeout from keep
alive. A man page patch will be submitted separately.
Signed-off-by: Rao Shoaib
---
net/ipv4/tcp.c | 10 --
net/ipv4/tcp_timer.c | 9 +
2 files changed, 9
On 08/09/2017 05:20 PM, Joe Smith wrote:
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 4:52 PM, Jerry Chu wrote:
[try to recover from long lost memory]
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Yuchung Cheng wrote:
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Rao Shoaib wrote:
Change from version 0: Rationale behind the change
On 08/09/2017 05:30 PM, David Miller wrote:
From: Joe Smith
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 17:20:32 -0700
Making Linux conform to standards and behavior that is logical seems
like a good enough reason.
That's an awesome attitude to have when we're implementing something
new and don't have the facili
On 08/09/2017 09:59 PM, Jerry Chu wrote:
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 8:32 PM, Jerry Chu wrote:
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Rao Shoaib wrote:
On 08/09/2017 05:30 PM, David Miller wrote:
From: Joe Smith
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 17:20:32 -0700
Making Linux conform to standards and behavior
24 matches
Mail list logo
