On 9/27/2016 6:03 PM, Steve Wise wrote:
>>
>>>
From: Steve Wise
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 07:54:55 -0700
> This series enables a new work request to optimize small REG_MR
> operations. This is intended for 4.9. If everyone agrees, I suggest
> Doug take both the cxgb4
>
> >
> >>
> >> From: Steve Wise
> >> Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 07:54:55 -0700
> >>
> >> > This series enables a new work request to optimize small REG_MR
> >> > operations. This is intended for 4.9. If everyone agrees, I suggest
> >> > Doug take both the cxgb4 and iw_cxgb4 patches through his tre
From: "Steve Wise"
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 09:17:01 -0500
>
>>
>> From: Steve Wise
>> Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 07:54:55 -0700
>>
>> > This series enables a new work request to optimize small REG_MR
>> > operations. This is intended for 4.9. If everyone agrees, I suggest
>> > Doug take both the
>
> From: Steve Wise
> Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 07:54:55 -0700
>
> > This series enables a new work request to optimize small REG_MR
> > operations. This is intended for 4.9. If everyone agrees, I suggest
> > Doug take both the cxgb4 and iw_cxgb4 patches through his tree.
>
> I'm assuming this
From: Steve Wise
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 07:54:55 -0700
> This series enables a new work request to optimize small REG_MR
> operations. This is intended for 4.9. If everyone agrees, I suggest
> Doug take both the cxgb4 and iw_cxgb4 patches through his tree.
I'm assuming this mean that I do _not
This series enables a new work request to optimize small REG_MR
operations. This is intended for 4.9. If everyone agrees, I suggest
Doug take both the cxgb4 and iw_cxgb4 patches through his tree.
Thanks,
Steve.
---
Steve Wise (2):
cxgb4: advertise support for FR_NSMR_TPTE_WR
iw_cxgb4: add
