Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: irda: Replace mdelay with usleep_range in stir421x_fw_upload

On 2018/4/11 22:26, David Miller wrote: From: Jia-Ju Bai Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 16:20:22 +0800 Okay, I now know why many of my patches were not replied. Many of your patches are not responded to because you handle patch feedback poorly sometimes. Okay, thanks for

Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: irda: Replace mdelay with usleep_range in stir421x_fw_upload

From: Jia-Ju Bai Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 16:20:22 +0800 > Okay, I now know why many of my patches were not replied. Many of your patches are not responded to because you handle patch feedback poorly sometimes. Also, all of your networking submissions have been dropped

Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: irda: Replace mdelay with usleep_range in stir421x_fw_upload

On 2018/4/11 16:17, Greg KH wrote: On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 04:11:00PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote: On 2018/4/11 16:03, Greg KH wrote: On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 03:17:10PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote: On 2018/4/11 14:41, Greg KH wrote: On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 09:29:34AM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:

Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: irda: Replace mdelay with usleep_range in stir421x_fw_upload

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 04:11:00PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote: > > > On 2018/4/11 16:03, Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 03:17:10PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote: > > > > > > On 2018/4/11 14:41, Greg KH wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 09:29:34AM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote: > > > > >

Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: irda: Replace mdelay with usleep_range in stir421x_fw_upload

On 2018/4/11 16:03, Greg KH wrote: On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 03:17:10PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote: On 2018/4/11 14:41, Greg KH wrote: On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 09:29:34AM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote: stir421x_fw_upload() is never called in atomic context. The call chain ending up at

Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: irda: Replace mdelay with usleep_range in stir421x_fw_upload

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 03:17:10PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote: > > > On 2018/4/11 14:41, Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 09:29:34AM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote: > > > stir421x_fw_upload() is never called in atomic context. > > > > > > The call chain ending up at stir421x_fw_upload() is: > >

Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: irda: Replace mdelay with usleep_range in stir421x_fw_upload

On 2018/4/11 14:41, Greg KH wrote: On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 09:29:34AM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote: stir421x_fw_upload() is never called in atomic context. The call chain ending up at stir421x_fw_upload() is: [1] stir421x_fw_upload() <- stir421x_patch_device() <- irda_usb_probe()

Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: irda: Replace mdelay with usleep_range in stir421x_fw_upload

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 09:29:34AM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote: > stir421x_fw_upload() is never called in atomic context. > > The call chain ending up at stir421x_fw_upload() is: > [1] stir421x_fw_upload() <- stir421x_patch_device() <- irda_usb_probe() > > irda_usb_probe() is set as ".probe" in

Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: irda: Replace mdelay with usleep_range in stir421x_fw_upload

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 09:29:34AM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote: > stir421x_fw_upload() is never called in atomic context. > > The call chain ending up at stir421x_fw_upload() is: > [1] stir421x_fw_upload() <- stir421x_patch_device() <- irda_usb_probe() > > irda_usb_probe() is set as ".probe" in

[PATCH 1/2] staging: irda: Replace mdelay with usleep_range in stir421x_fw_upload

stir421x_fw_upload() is never called in atomic context. The call chain ending up at stir421x_fw_upload() is: [1] stir421x_fw_upload() <- stir421x_patch_device() <- irda_usb_probe() irda_usb_probe() is set as ".probe" in struct usb_driver. This function is not called in atomic context. Despite