Hi,
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016, at 16:03, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-10-10 at 15:43 +0200, Sabrina Dubroca wrote:
> > Currently, GRO can do unlimited recursion through the gro_receive
> > handlers. This was fixed for tunneling protocols by limiting tunnel GRO
> > to one level with encap_mark, b
Hi Eric,
2016-10-10, 07:03:56 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-10-10 at 15:43 +0200, Sabrina Dubroca wrote:
> > Currently, GRO can do unlimited recursion through the gro_receive
> > handlers. This was fixed for tunneling protocols by limiting tunnel GRO
> > to one level with encap_mark,
On Mon, 2016-10-10 at 15:43 +0200, Sabrina Dubroca wrote:
> Currently, GRO can do unlimited recursion through the gro_receive
> handlers. This was fixed for tunneling protocols by limiting tunnel GRO
> to one level with encap_mark, but both VLAN and TEB still have this
> problem. Thus, the kernel
Currently, GRO can do unlimited recursion through the gro_receive
handlers. This was fixed for tunneling protocols by limiting tunnel GRO
to one level with encap_mark, but both VLAN and TEB still have this
problem. Thus, the kernel is vulnerable to a stack overflow, if we
receive a packet compose
