Re: [PATCH net-next V2 00/16] Mellanox 100G SRIOV E-Switch offload and VF representors

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 1:16 PM, David Miller wrote: > > So you have submitted to me, in parallel, two non-trivial sets of changes > to the mlx5 driver. One for 'net' and one for 'net-next, and at the same > exact time. > > You haven't given me any indication of whether there

Re: [PATCH net-next V2 00/16] Mellanox 100G SRIOV E-Switch offload and VF representors

So you have submitted to me, in parallel, two non-trivial sets of changes to the mlx5 driver. One for 'net' and one for 'net-next, and at the same exact time. You haven't given me any indication of whether there are any dependencies nor conflicts from these two sets of changes. So I'm tossing

[PATCH net-next V2 00/16] Mellanox 100G SRIOV E-Switch offload and VF representors

Hi Dave We are happy to announce SRIOV E-Switch offload and VF netdev representors. Or Gerlitz says: Currently, the way SR-IOV embedded switches are dealt with in Linux is limited in its expressiveness and flexibility, but this is not necessarily due to hardware limitations. The kernel