On 2016年12月07日 11:25, David Miller wrote:
From: Jason Wang
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 11:21:11 +0800
David, looks like this commit is not in net-next.git.
Please help to check.
Take a look, it should be there now.
Yes, thanks.
On 2016年12月02日 03:43, David Miller wrote:
From: Andrey Konovalov
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 10:34:40 +0100
This patch changes tun.c to call netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx
when a packet is received (if CONFIG_4KSTACKS is not enabled to avoid
stack exhaustion). The
From: Jason Wang
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 11:21:11 +0800
> David, looks like this commit is not in net-next.git.
>
> Please help to check.
Take a look, it should be there now.
From: Andrey Konovalov
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 10:34:40 +0100
> This patch changes tun.c to call netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx
> when a packet is received (if CONFIG_4KSTACKS is not enabled to avoid
> stack exhaustion). The difference between the two is that
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 10:34:40AM +0100, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> This patch changes tun.c to call netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx
> when a packet is received (if CONFIG_4KSTACKS is not enabled to avoid
> stack exhaustion). The difference between the two is that netif_rx queues
> the
On 2016年12月01日 17:34, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
This patch changes tun.c to call netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx
when a packet is received (if CONFIG_4KSTACKS is not enabled to avoid
stack exhaustion). The difference between the two is that netif_rx queues
the packet into the backlog, and
This patch changes tun.c to call netif_receive_skb instead of netif_rx
when a packet is received (if CONFIG_4KSTACKS is not enabled to avoid
stack exhaustion). The difference between the two is that netif_rx queues
the packet into the backlog, and netif_receive_skb proccesses the packet
in the