Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] Add new PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_RELAXED_ORDERING flag

2017-08-07 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 02:14:48PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Ding Tianhong > Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 12:13:17 +0800 > > > Hi David： > > > > I think networking tree merge it is a better choice, as it mainly used to > > tell the NIC > > drivers how to use the

Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] Add new PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_RELAXED_ORDERING flag

2017-08-07 Thread David Miller
From: Ding Tianhong Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 12:13:17 +0800 > Hi David： > > I think networking tree merge it is a better choice, as it mainly used to > tell the NIC > drivers how to use the Relaxed Ordering Attribute, and later we need send > patch to enable > RO for

Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] Add new PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_RELAXED_ORDERING flag

2017-08-06 Thread Ding Tianhong
On 2017/8/7 11:47, David Miller wrote: > From: Ding Tianhong > Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 15:15:09 +0800 > >> Some devices have problems with Transaction Layer Packets with the Relaxed >> Ordering Attribute set. This patch set adds a new PCIe Device Flag, >>

Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] Add new PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_RELAXED_ORDERING flag

2017-08-06 Thread David Miller
From: Ding Tianhong Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 15:15:09 +0800 > Some devices have problems with Transaction Layer Packets with the Relaxed > Ordering Attribute set. This patch set adds a new PCIe Device Flag, > PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_RELAXED_ORDERING, a set of PCI Quirks to catch

[PATCH v9 0/4] Add new PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_RELAXED_ORDERING flag

2017-08-05 Thread Ding Tianhong
Some devices have problems with Transaction Layer Packets with the Relaxed Ordering Attribute set. This patch set adds a new PCIe Device Flag, PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_RELAXED_ORDERING, a set of PCI Quirks to catch some known devices with Relaxed Ordering issues, and a use of this new flag by the cxgb4