Re: [net-next v2 1/5] net/tls: Do not enable zero-copy prematurely

2018-07-18 Thread David Miller
From: Vakul Garg 
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 21:27:11 +0530

> Zero-copy mode was left enabled even when zerocopy_from_iter() failed.
> Set the zero-copy mode only when zerocopy_from_iter() succeeds. This
> leads to removal of argument 'zc' of function decrypt_skb_update().
> Function decrypt_skb_update() does not need to check whether
> ctx->decrypted is set since it is never called if ctx->decrypted is
> true.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vakul Garg 

This adds a warning:

net/tls/tls_sw.c: In function ‘decrypt_skb_update’:
net/tls/tls_sw.c:662:28: warning: unused variable ‘ctx’ [-Wunused-variable]
  struct tls_sw_context_rx *ctx = tls_sw_ctx_rx(tls_ctx);

Also, you must submit a patch series with a proper cover letter
"[net-next vX 0/N] net/tls: ..." explaining what the patch series
is doing, how it is doing it, and why it doing it that way.

You should also provide appropriate "Fixes: " tags to your
patches.

Thank you.


[net-next v2 1/5] net/tls: Do not enable zero-copy prematurely

2018-07-16 Thread Vakul Garg
Zero-copy mode was left enabled even when zerocopy_from_iter() failed.
Set the zero-copy mode only when zerocopy_from_iter() succeeds. This
leads to removal of argument 'zc' of function decrypt_skb_update().
Function decrypt_skb_update() does not need to check whether
ctx->decrypted is set since it is never called if ctx->decrypted is
true.

Signed-off-by: Vakul Garg 
---
 net/tls/tls_sw.c | 22 +-
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/tls/tls_sw.c b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
index 7d194c0cd6cf..e94cb54a6994 100644
--- a/net/tls/tls_sw.c
+++ b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
@@ -656,7 +656,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *tls_wait_data(struct sock *sk, int 
flags,
 }
 
 static int decrypt_skb_update(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
- struct scatterlist *sgout, bool *zc)
+ struct scatterlist *sgout)
 {
struct tls_context *tls_ctx = tls_get_ctx(sk);
struct tls_sw_context_rx *ctx = tls_sw_ctx_rx(tls_ctx);
@@ -668,13 +668,9 @@ static int decrypt_skb_update(struct sock *sk, struct 
sk_buff *skb,
if (err < 0)
return err;
 #endif
-   if (!ctx->decrypted) {
-   err = decrypt_skb(sk, skb, sgout);
-   if (err < 0)
-   return err;
-   } else {
-   *zc = false;
-   }
+   err = decrypt_skb(sk, skb, sgout);
+   if (err < 0)
+   return err;
 
rxm->offset += tls_ctx->rx.prepend_size;
rxm->full_len -= tls_ctx->rx.overhead_size;
@@ -819,7 +815,6 @@ int tls_sw_recvmsg(struct sock *sk,
struct scatterlist sgin[MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1];
int pages = 0;
 
-   zc = true;
sg_init_table(sgin, MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1);
sg_set_buf([0], ctx->rx_aad_plaintext,
   TLS_AAD_SPACE_SIZE);
@@ -830,8 +825,10 @@ int tls_sw_recvmsg(struct sock *sk,
 MAX_SKB_FRAGS, false, 
true);
if (err < 0)
goto fallback_to_reg_recv;
+   else
+   zc = true;
 
-   err = decrypt_skb_update(sk, skb, sgin, );
+   err = decrypt_skb_update(sk, skb, sgin);
for (; pages > 0; pages--)
put_page(sg_page([pages]));
if (err < 0) {
@@ -840,7 +837,7 @@ int tls_sw_recvmsg(struct sock *sk,
}
} else {
 fallback_to_reg_recv:
-   err = decrypt_skb_update(sk, skb, NULL, );
+   err = decrypt_skb_update(sk, skb, NULL);
if (err < 0) {
tls_err_abort(sk, EBADMSG);
goto recv_end;
@@ -895,7 +892,6 @@ ssize_t tls_sw_splice_read(struct socket *sock,  loff_t 
*ppos,
int err = 0;
long timeo;
int chunk;
-   bool zc;
 
lock_sock(sk);
 
@@ -912,7 +908,7 @@ ssize_t tls_sw_splice_read(struct socket *sock,  loff_t 
*ppos,
}
 
if (!ctx->decrypted) {
-   err = decrypt_skb_update(sk, skb, NULL, );
+   err = decrypt_skb_update(sk, skb, NULL);
 
if (err < 0) {
tls_err_abort(sk, EBADMSG);
-- 
2.13.6