On Sun, Apr 09, 2017 at 09:12:18AM +0530, Arushi Singhal wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 1:44 AM, Pablo Neira Ayuso
> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Apr 08, 2017 at 08:21:56PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> > > On Saturday 2017-04-08 19:21, Arushi Singhal wrote:
> > >
> > > >Replace
2017-04-09 16:26 GMT+08:00 Jan Engelhardt :
>
> On Sunday 2017-04-09 05:42, Arushi Singhal wrote:
>>On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 1:44 AM, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 08, 2017 at 08:21:56PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>> > On Saturday
On Sunday 2017-04-09 05:42, Arushi Singhal wrote:
>On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 1:44 AM, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 08, 2017 at 08:21:56PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> > On Saturday 2017-04-08 19:21, Arushi Singhal wrote:
> >
> > >Replace explicit
On Sat, Apr 08, 2017 at 08:21:56PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Saturday 2017-04-08 19:21, Arushi Singhal wrote:
>
> >Replace explicit NULL comparison with ! operator to simplify code.
>
> I still wouldn't do this, for the same reason as before. Comparing to
> NULL explicitly more or less
On Saturday 2017-04-08 19:21, Arushi Singhal wrote:
>Replace explicit NULL comparison with ! operator to simplify code.
I still wouldn't do this, for the same reason as before. Comparing to
NULL explicitly more or less gave an extra guarantee that the other
operand was also a pointer.