Hi Andrew,
On mar., févr. 27 2018, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 11:24:02AM +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> On jeu., févr. 22 2018, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>>
>> > Not all boards using the mv88e6xxx switches have the interrupt output
>> > connected to a GPIO. O
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 11:24:02AM +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On jeu., févr. 22 2018, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>
> > Not all boards using the mv88e6xxx switches have the interrupt output
> > connected to a GPIO. On these boards phylib has to poll the PHYs,
> > rather than use int
Hi Andrew,
On jeu., févr. 22 2018, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> Not all boards using the mv88e6xxx switches have the interrupt output
> connected to a GPIO. On these boards phylib has to poll the PHYs,
> rather than use interrupts. Have the driver poll the interrupt status
> register, which is more ef
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 11:29:58AM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Andrew Lunn
> Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 22:58:31 +0100
>
> > Not all boards using the mv88e6xxx switches have the interrupt output
> > connected to a GPIO. On these boards phylib has to poll the PHYs,
> > rather than use interrupt
From: Andrew Lunn
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 22:58:31 +0100
> Not all boards using the mv88e6xxx switches have the interrupt output
> connected to a GPIO. On these boards phylib has to poll the PHYs,
> rather than use interrupts. Have the driver poll the interrupt status
> register, which is more eff
From: Andrew Lunn
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 22:58:31 +0100
> Not all boards using the mv88e6xxx switches have the interrupt output
> connected to a GPIO. On these boards phylib has to poll the PHYs,
> rather than use interrupts. Have the driver poll the interrupt status
> register, which is more eff
