Please use a more meaningful patch summary. This one is too generic.
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 05:27:11PM +0300, Vlad Buslov wrote:
...
> +int tcf_idr_find_delete(struct tc_action_net *tn, u32 index)
What about naming it tcf_idr_delete_index() instead?
The find operation is always implicit when you
On Wed 16 May 2018 at 08:56, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Wed, May 16, 2018 at 10:16:13AM CEST, vla...@mellanox.com wrote:
>>
>>On Wed 16 May 2018 at 07:50, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>> Mon, May 14, 2018 at 04:27:11PM CEST, vla...@mellanox.com wrote:
Implement new action API function to atomically delete ac
Wed, May 16, 2018 at 10:16:13AM CEST, vla...@mellanox.com wrote:
>
>On Wed 16 May 2018 at 07:50, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Mon, May 14, 2018 at 04:27:11PM CEST, vla...@mellanox.com wrote:
>>>Implement new action API function to atomically delete action with
>>>specified index and to atomically insert u
On Wed 16 May 2018 at 07:50, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Mon, May 14, 2018 at 04:27:11PM CEST, vla...@mellanox.com wrote:
>>Implement new action API function to atomically delete action with
>>specified index and to atomically insert unique action. These functions are
>>required to implement init and del
Mon, May 14, 2018 at 04:27:11PM CEST, vla...@mellanox.com wrote:
>Implement new action API function to atomically delete action with
>specified index and to atomically insert unique action. These functions are
>required to implement init and delete functions for specific actions that
>do not rely o