On 2/21/18 9:22 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
>> +u32 rt6_multipath_hash(const struct net *net, const struct flowi6 *fl6,
>> + const struct sk_buff *skb)
>> {
>> struct flow_keys hash_keys;
>> u32 mhash;
>>
>> -memset(&hash_keys, 0, sizeof(hash_keys));
>> -hash_key
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 04:06:00PM -0800, David Ahern wrote:
> Some operators prefer IPv6 path selection to use a standard 5-tuple
> hash rather than just an L3 hash with the flow the label. To that end
> add support to IPv6 for multipath hash policy similar to bf4e0a3db97eb
> ("net: ipv4: add supp
Le 13/02/2018 à 22:02, David Ahern a écrit :
> On 2/13/18 1:59 PM, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
>> Le 13/02/2018 à 21:35, David Ahern a écrit :
>>> On 2/13/18 1:31 PM, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
Le 13/02/2018 à 01:06, David Ahern a écrit :
> Some operators prefer IPv6 path selection to use a standar
On 2/13/18 1:59 PM, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> Le 13/02/2018 à 21:35, David Ahern a écrit :
>> On 2/13/18 1:31 PM, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
>>> Le 13/02/2018 à 01:06, David Ahern a écrit :
Some operators prefer IPv6 path selection to use a standard 5-tuple
hash rather than just an L3 hash wit
Le 13/02/2018 à 21:35, David Ahern a écrit :
> On 2/13/18 1:31 PM, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
>> Le 13/02/2018 à 01:06, David Ahern a écrit :
>>> Some operators prefer IPv6 path selection to use a standard 5-tuple
>>> hash rather than just an L3 hash with the flow the label. To that end
>>> add support
On 2/13/18 1:31 PM, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> Le 13/02/2018 à 01:06, David Ahern a écrit :
>> Some operators prefer IPv6 path selection to use a standard 5-tuple
>> hash rather than just an L3 hash with the flow the label. To that end
>> add support to IPv6 for multipath hash policy similar to bf4e0
Le 13/02/2018 à 01:06, David Ahern a écrit :
> Some operators prefer IPv6 path selection to use a standard 5-tuple
> hash rather than just an L3 hash with the flow the label. To that end
> add support to IPv6 for multipath hash policy similar to bf4e0a3db97eb
> ("net: ipv4: add support for ECMP has