Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: better availability probing for seg6 helpers

2018-07-11 Thread Daniel Borkmann
On 07/10/2018 09:20 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 07/10/2018 06:54 PM, Mathieu Xhonneux wrote:
>> bpf_lwt_seg6_* helpers require CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6_BPF, and currently
>> return -EOPNOTSUPP to indicate unavailability. This patch forces the
>> BPF verifier to reject programs using these helpers when
>> !CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6_BPF, allowing users to more easily probe if they are
>> available or not.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Xhonneux 
> 
> Note, just fyi, this would need to go to bpf tree (and not bpf-next) as
> otherwise there's a change in behavior.

Applied, thanks Mathieu!


Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: better availability probing for seg6 helpers

2018-07-10 Thread Daniel Borkmann
On 07/10/2018 06:54 PM, Mathieu Xhonneux wrote:
> bpf_lwt_seg6_* helpers require CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6_BPF, and currently
> return -EOPNOTSUPP to indicate unavailability. This patch forces the
> BPF verifier to reject programs using these helpers when
> !CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6_BPF, allowing users to more easily probe if they are
> available or not.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Xhonneux 

Note, just fyi, this would need to go to bpf tree (and not bpf-next) as
otherwise there's a change in behavior.

Thanks,
Daniel