Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] net sched: stylistic cleanups

2016-09-19 Thread David Miller 
From: Jamal Hadi Salim 
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 08:45:33 -0400

> From: Jamal Hadi Salim 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jamal Hadi Salim 

Applied.

Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] net sched: stylistic cleanups

2016-09-18 Thread Cong Wang 
On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 5:45 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim  wrote:
> rtnl_register(PF_UNSPEC, RTM_NEWQDISC, tc_modify_qdisc, NULL, NULL);
> rtnl_register(PF_UNSPEC, RTM_DELQDISC, tc_get_qdisc, NULL, NULL);
> -   rtnl_register(PF_UNSPEC, RTM_GETQDISC, tc_get_qdisc, tc_dump_qdisc, 
> NULL);
> +   rtnl_register(PF_UNSPEC, RTM_GETQDISC, tc_get_qdisc, tc_dump_qdisc,
> + NULL);
> rtnl_register(PF_UNSPEC, RTM_NEWTCLASS, tc_ctl_tclass, NULL, NULL);
> rtnl_register(PF_UNSPEC, RTM_DELTCLASS, tc_ctl_tclass, NULL, NULL);
> -   rtnl_register(PF_UNSPEC, RTM_GETTCLASS, tc_ctl_tclass, 
> tc_dump_tclass, NULL);
> +   rtnl_register(PF_UNSPEC, RTM_GETTCLASS, tc_ctl_tclass, tc_dump_tclass,
> + NULL);

Keeping them in the same line is more readable, IMHO.