Re: [PATCH net-next v6 10/10] virtio_net: xsk: rx: free the unused xsk buffer

2024-06-27 Thread Jason Wang
On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 3:57 PM Xuan Zhuo  wrote:
>
> Release the xsk buffer, when the queue is releasing or the queue is
> resizing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo 
> ---
>  drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 5 +
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index cfa106aa8039..33695b86bd99 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -967,6 +967,11 @@ static void virtnet_rq_unmap_free_buf(struct virtqueue 
> *vq, void *buf)
>
> rq = &vi->rq[i];
>
> +   if (rq->xsk.pool) {
> +   xsk_buff_free((struct xdp_buff *)buf);
> +   return;
> +   }

It seems it needs to be squashed into previous patches?

Thanks


> +
> if (!vi->big_packets || vi->mergeable_rx_bufs)
> virtnet_rq_unmap(rq, buf, 0);
>
> --
> 2.32.0.3.g01195cf9f
>




Re: [PATCH net-next v6 10/10] virtio_net: xsk: rx: free the unused xsk buffer

2024-06-20 Thread Xuan Zhuo
On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 12:46:24 +0200, Paolo Abeni  wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-06-18 at 15:56 +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> > Release the xsk buffer, when the queue is releasing or the queue is
> > resizing.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo 
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 5 +
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > index cfa106aa8039..33695b86bd99 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > @@ -967,6 +967,11 @@ static void virtnet_rq_unmap_free_buf(struct virtqueue 
> > *vq, void *buf)
> >
> > rq = &vi->rq[i];
> >
> > +   if (rq->xsk.pool) {
> > +   xsk_buff_free((struct xdp_buff *)buf);
> > +   return;
> > +   }
> > +
> > if (!vi->big_packets || vi->mergeable_rx_bufs)
> > virtnet_rq_unmap(rq, buf, 0);
>
>
> I'm under the impression this should be squashed in a previous patch,
> likely "virtio_net: xsk: bind/unbind xsk for rx"

OK.

Thanks.


>
> Thanks,
>
> Paolo
>



Re: [PATCH net-next v6 10/10] virtio_net: xsk: rx: free the unused xsk buffer

2024-06-20 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 12:46:24PM +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-06-18 at 15:56 +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> > Release the xsk buffer, when the queue is releasing or the queue is
> > resizing.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo 
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 5 +
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > index cfa106aa8039..33695b86bd99 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > @@ -967,6 +967,11 @@ static void virtnet_rq_unmap_free_buf(struct virtqueue 
> > *vq, void *buf)
> >  
> > rq = &vi->rq[i];
> >  
> > +   if (rq->xsk.pool) {
> > +   xsk_buff_free((struct xdp_buff *)buf);
> > +   return;
> > +   }
> > +
> > if (!vi->big_packets || vi->mergeable_rx_bufs)
> > virtnet_rq_unmap(rq, buf, 0);
> 
> 
> I'm under the impression this should be squashed in a previous patch,
> likely "virtio_net: xsk: bind/unbind xsk for rx"
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Paolo


agreed, looks weird.




Re: [PATCH net-next v6 10/10] virtio_net: xsk: rx: free the unused xsk buffer

2024-06-20 Thread Paolo Abeni
On Tue, 2024-06-18 at 15:56 +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> Release the xsk buffer, when the queue is releasing or the queue is
> resizing.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo 
> ---
>  drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 5 +
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index cfa106aa8039..33695b86bd99 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -967,6 +967,11 @@ static void virtnet_rq_unmap_free_buf(struct virtqueue 
> *vq, void *buf)
>  
>   rq = &vi->rq[i];
>  
> + if (rq->xsk.pool) {
> + xsk_buff_free((struct xdp_buff *)buf);
> + return;
> + }
> +
>   if (!vi->big_packets || vi->mergeable_rx_bufs)
>   virtnet_rq_unmap(rq, buf, 0);


I'm under the impression this should be squashed in a previous patch,
likely "virtio_net: xsk: bind/unbind xsk for rx"

Thanks,

Paolo