Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] Add new PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_RELAXED_ORDERING flag
On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 02:14:48PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Ding Tianhong > Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 12:13:17 +0800 > > > Hi David： > > > > I think networking tree merge it is a better choice, as it mainly used to > > tell the NIC > > drivers how to use the Relaxed Ordering Attribute, and later we need send > > patch to enable > > RO for ixgbe driver base on this patch. But I am not sure whether Bjorn has > > some of his own > > view. :) > > > > Hi Bjorn: > > > > Could you help review this patch or give some feedback ? > > I'm still waiting on this... > > Bjorn? I was on vacation Friday-today, but I'll look at this series this week.
Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] Add new PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_RELAXED_ORDERING flag
From: Ding Tianhong Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 12:13:17 +0800 > Hi David： > > I think networking tree merge it is a better choice, as it mainly used to > tell the NIC > drivers how to use the Relaxed Ordering Attribute, and later we need send > patch to enable > RO for ixgbe driver base on this patch. But I am not sure whether Bjorn has > some of his own > view. :) > > Hi Bjorn: > > Could you help review this patch or give some feedback ? I'm still waiting on this... Bjorn?
Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] Add new PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_RELAXED_ORDERING flag
On 2017/8/7 11:47, David Miller wrote: > From: Ding Tianhong > Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 15:15:09 +0800 > >> Some devices have problems with Transaction Layer Packets with the Relaxed >> Ordering Attribute set. This patch set adds a new PCIe Device Flag, >> PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_RELAXED_ORDERING, a set of PCI Quirks to catch some known >> devices with Relaxed Ordering issues, and a use of this new flag by the >> cxgb4 driver to avoid using Relaxed Ordering with problematic Root Complex >> Ports. >> >> It's been years since I've submitted kernel.org patches, I appolgise for the >> almost certain submission errors. > > Which tree should merge this? The PCI tree or my networking tree? > Hi David： I think networking tree merge it is a better choice, as it mainly used to tell the NIC drivers how to use the Relaxed Ordering Attribute, and later we need send patch to enable RO for ixgbe driver base on this patch. But I am not sure whether Bjorn has some of his own view. :) Hi Bjorn: Could you help review this patch or give some feedback ? Thanks Ding > . >
Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] Add new PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_RELAXED_ORDERING flag
From: Ding Tianhong Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 15:15:09 +0800 > Some devices have problems with Transaction Layer Packets with the Relaxed > Ordering Attribute set. This patch set adds a new PCIe Device Flag, > PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_RELAXED_ORDERING, a set of PCI Quirks to catch some known > devices with Relaxed Ordering issues, and a use of this new flag by the > cxgb4 driver to avoid using Relaxed Ordering with problematic Root Complex > Ports. > > It's been years since I've submitted kernel.org patches, I appolgise for the > almost certain submission errors. Which tree should merge this? The PCI tree or my networking tree?
