On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 01:45:47PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jiri Pirko
> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 19:02:19 +0100
>
> > The discussion we had before was about flag bitfield that was there
> > *always*. In this case, that is not true. It is either ifindex or
> > ifname.
From: Jiri Pirko
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 19:02:19 +0100
> The discussion we had before was about flag bitfield that was there
> *always*. In this case, that is not true. It is either ifindex or
> ifname. Even rtnetlink has ifname as attribute.
>
> The flags and info_mask is
Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 05:56:51PM CET, da...@davemloft.net wrote:
>From: Jiri Pirko
>Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 17:02:21 +0100
>
>> Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 02:53:31PM CET, mkube...@suse.cz wrote:
>>>No function implemented yet, only genetlink and module infrastructure.
From: Jiri Pirko
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 17:02:21 +0100
> Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 02:53:31PM CET, mkube...@suse.cz wrote:
>>No function implemented yet, only genetlink and module infrastructure.
>>Register/unregister genetlink family "ethtool" and allow the module to be
Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 02:53:31PM CET, mkube...@suse.cz wrote:
>No function implemented yet, only genetlink and module infrastructure.
>Register/unregister genetlink family "ethtool" and allow the module to be
>autoloaded by genetlink code (if built as a module, distributions would
>probably prefer