On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 03:53:48PM +0200, Ivo van Doorn wrote:
> I think the problem is what the dscape exactly expects the driver to do when
> add_interface() is called by the stack. When that call has finished, does the
> stack
> expects the radio to be enabled, or should it instruct the driver
On Wed, 10 May 2006 15:53:48 +0200, Ivo van Doorn wrote:
> I think the problem is what the dscape exactly expects the driver to do when
> add_interface() is called by the stack. When that call has finished, does the
> stack
> expects the radio to be enabled, or should it instruct the driver to ena
On Wednesday 10 May 2006 12:52, Jiri Benc wrote:
> On Wed, 10 May 2006 00:01:16 +0200, Ivo van Doorn wrote:
> > Basicly the dscape stack is performing active scanning while the device is
> > down,
> > but during the active scan it is sending packets out, or at least
> > attempting to do so.
> > B
On Wed, 10 May 2006 15:37:11 +0200, Ivo van Doorn wrote:
> True, I agree here. But when rt2x00 was using the ipw stack a much
> requested feature from users was to be able to perform scanning while
> interface was down. (The requests did not specify if it they wanted passive
> or active scanning)
On Wednesday 10 May 2006 12:42, Jiri Benc wrote:
> On Sat, 6 May 2006 14:00:58 +0200, Ivo van Doorn wrote:
> > In rt2x00 the config() handler schedules all configuration changes by using
> > a workqueue,
> > this is required since several configuration changes in rt2x00 need
> > sleeping and for
On Wednesday 10 May 2006 00:36, Michael Wu wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 May 2006 18:01, Ivo van Doorn wrote:
> > A user on the forums Olivier Cornu (added to the CC list) has done some
> > investigation into the scanning behaviour of the dscape stack.
> > Basicly the dscape stack is performing active sca
On Wed, 10 May 2006 00:01:16 +0200, Ivo van Doorn wrote:
> Basicly the dscape stack is performing active scanning while the device is
> down,
> but during the active scan it is sending packets out, or at least attempting
> to do so.
> Besides the question if active scanning is preferred over pass
On Sat, 6 May 2006 14:00:58 +0200, Ivo van Doorn wrote:
> In rt2x00 the config() handler schedules all configuration changes by using a
> workqueue,
> this is required since several configuration changes in rt2x00 need sleeping
> and for
> USB devices all register access requires sleeping. And th
2006/5/10, Michael Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Tuesday 09 May 2006 18:01, Ivo van Doorn wrote:
> A user on the forums Olivier Cornu (added to the CC list) has done some
> investigation into the scanning behaviour of the dscape stack.
> Basicly the dscape stack is performing active scanning while t
On Tuesday 09 May 2006 18:01, Ivo van Doorn wrote:
> A user on the forums Olivier Cornu (added to the CC list) has done some
> investigation into the scanning behaviour of the dscape stack.
> Basicly the dscape stack is performing active scanning while the device is
> down, but during the active sc
> While working on the rt2x00 driver, I keep hitting against some problems with
> scanning.
> Basicly the dscape stack handles scanning in 2 ways, through the
> passive_scan() handler in the ieee80211_hw structure, and by calling
> the config() handler in the ieee80211_hw stucture.
>
> The usage
11 matches
Mail list logo
