From: Yury Norov
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 20:03:13 +0300
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 11:42:18AM -0500, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Yury Norov
>> Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 19:26:23 +0300
>>
>> > On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 11:17:36AM -0500, David Miller
On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 11:42:18AM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Yury Norov
> Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 19:26:23 +0300
>
> > On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 11:17:36AM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> >> From: Heiner Kallweit
> >> Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018
From: Yury Norov
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 19:26:23 +0300
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 11:17:36AM -0500, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Heiner Kallweit
>> Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 07:21:32 +0100
>>
>> > Recently ethtool started to give incomplete values for
On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 11:17:36AM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Heiner Kallweit
> Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 07:21:32 +0100
>
> > Recently ethtool started to give incomplete values for supported and
> > advertised modes. There seems to be a regression in this commit:
> >
From: Heiner Kallweit
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 07:21:32 +0100
> Recently ethtool started to give incomplete values for supported and
> advertised modes. There seems to be a regression in this commit:
> The bit number parameter in the calls to bitmap_to_arr32() in
>
On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 07:21:32AM +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> Recently ethtool started to give incomplete values for supported and
> advertised modes. There seems to be a regression in this commit:
> The bit number parameter in the calls to bitmap_to_arr32() in
>
Recently ethtool started to give incomplete values for supported and
advertised modes. There seems to be a regression in this commit:
The bit number parameter in the calls to bitmap_to_arr32() in
store_link_ksettings_for_user() should be __ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_MASK_NBITS
instead of