On Mon, 04 Jun 2007 18:35:58 +0200
Thomas Gleixner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 09:09 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
I did the test with an 2.6.22-rc3-git4 kernel and the p54 driver built
external as module.
Can you look at iperf to figure out, whether it does
On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 09:59 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
gettimeofday({1180973726, 982754}, NULL) = 0
recv(4, \0\0\0\0\0\0\0\1\0\0\23\211\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\377\377\364...,
8192, 0) = 8192
gettimeofday({1180973726, 983790}, NULL) = 0
Well, gettimeofday() is not affected by the
On Mon, 04 Jun 2007 19:32:48 +0200
Thomas Gleixner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 09:59 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
gettimeofday({1180973726, 982754}, NULL) = 0
recv(4, \0\0\0\0\0\0\0\1\0\0\23\211\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\377\377\364...,
8192, 0) = 8192
On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 10:51 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
I doubt that. This is in the iperf code itself.
void thread_rest ( void ) {
#if defined( HAVE_THREAD )
#if defined( HAVE_POSIX_THREAD )
// TODO add checks for sched_yield or pthread_yield and call that
// if
On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 21:00 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
Yes, the following patch makes iperf work better than ever.
But are other broken applications going to have same problem.
Sounds like the old who runs first fork() problems.
Not really. The fork() who runs first problem is
* Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, the following patch makes iperf work better than ever. But are
other broken applications going to have same problem. Sounds like the
old who runs first fork() problems.
this is the first such app and really, and even for this app: i've been
On Monday 04 June 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, the following patch makes iperf work better than ever. But are
other broken applications going to have same problem. Sounds like the
old who runs first fork() problems.
this is the first such app
On Mon, 4 Jun 2007 21:47:59 +0200
Maximilian Engelhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 04 June 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, the following patch makes iperf work better than ever. But are
other broken applications going to have same
On Monday 04 June 2007, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Mon, 4 Jun 2007 21:47:59 +0200
Maximilian Engelhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 04 June 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, the following patch makes iperf work better than ever. But are
