Flag SYN not necessarily state NEW?

2002-06-16 Thread Geog Hofstetter
hmm is it possible that (if u use target LOG) your syslog just shows up 'blah: SYN packet received' 'last message repeatet 2 times' ;) On Wed, 8 May 2002, Ing. Christian Ogris wrote: I connect from Box A via SSH to Box B, where the firewall runs, and i get the state NEW on the

Re: Flag SYN not necessarily state NEW?

2002-06-16 Thread Antony Stone
On Sunday 16 June 2002 7:04 pm, Geog Hofstetter wrote: hmm is it possible that (if u use target LOG) your syslog just shows up 'blah: SYN packet received' 'last message repeatet 2 times' I would hope not - both the Source Port and the TCP ID number should be different for the two

Re: [x] - Re: Flag SYN not necessarily state NEW?

2002-06-16 Thread Geog Hofstetter
jep right, didnt think so far ;) then i think this phenomen is neither explainable nor believeable. if a connection is going to be established first SYN is sent SYN,ACK is received and ACK will be answered (TCP three-way handshake) i dont know any case where TCP-connections are established(!)

Re: Flag SYN not necessarily state NEW?

2002-06-15 Thread Matthew Hellman
I have tested this as im running SSH ans as you can see hear in the print out of my packets that i dont even need a Established Related Rule for SSH from the Internet or Internaly , this is handled by IP_conntrack moddule and so on .. :-) . I must not be understanding what you're saying

Re: Flag SYN not necessarily state NEW?

2002-06-15 Thread Chris
Matthew Hellman wrote: I must not be understanding what you're saying here, because you definitely need both a NEW and ESTABLISHED rule. In fact, this should always apply and I would be rather disappointed in netfilter if there were any exceptions. Don't think you need a RELATED rule

Re: Flag SYN not necessarily state NEW?

2002-06-15 Thread Jozsef Kadlecsik
On Sat, 15 Jun 2002, Hard__warE wrote: On Wed, 8 May 2002, Ing. Christian Ogris wrote: I connect from Box A via SSH to Box B, where the firewall runs, and i get the state NEW on the first packet. Then - the first connection is still established - i connect AGAIN from Box A to Box B and do

Flag SYN not necessarily state NEW?

2002-06-14 Thread Hard__warE
On Wed, 8 May 2002, Ing. Christian Ogris wrote: I connect from Box A via SSH to Box B, where the firewall runs, and i get the state NEW on the first packet. Then - the first connection is still established - i connect AGAIN from Box A to Box B and do NOT get the state NEW anymore. (So

Flag SYN not necessarily state NEW?

2002-06-13 Thread Ing. Christian Ogris
Good morning, just wondering if the behavior i discovered yesterday on our iptables- firewall is ok: I connect from Box A via SSH to Box B, where the firewall runs, and i get the state NEW on the first packet. Then - the first connection is still established - i connect AGAIN from Box A to Box