Dependence issue on today cvs

2002-06-03 Thread Thomas T. Soares
Hi all packets hackers... This is just to inform that the today CVS of netfilter is giving this to me: make patch-o-matic Making dependencies: please wait... Something wrong... deleting dependencies. make: *** [/coisas/linux/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ipt_dcsp.h] Error1 This is over 2.4.18

Re: [PATCH] linux tproxy support

2002-06-03 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On Monday 03 June 2002 17:58, Balazs Scheidler wrote: > TODO: > * when the socket is closed, the entry assigned to the socket > should be deleted. Sadly the only solution is to patch the core to > notify tproxy about this event, so the assigned entry can be > deleted. The standard conntrack code

Re: Stange ip_conntrack (newnat) behaviour.

2002-06-03 Thread A. van Schie
On Monday 03 June 2002 12:03, Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, 2 Jun 2002, A. van Schie wrote: > > I saw something strange that I think comes from ip_conntrack. > > > > I'm using conntrack-state to filter my packets. > > A simple version of my rules look like this: > > iptables -A OUTPU

[PATCH] linux tproxy support

2002-06-03 Thread Balazs Scheidler
Hi, I've released my new release of the Linux transparent proxy patch. It is available at: http://www.balabit.hu/en/downloads/tproxy/ or http://www.balabit.hu/downloads/tproxy/linux-2.4/cttproxy-2.4.18-02.tar.gz It features: * test programs for listening on/connecting from foreign addresses

About IP unused bit WAS:Why was not there any response to my patch?

2002-06-03 Thread Maciej Soltysiak
> However there are so many sanity checkings in unclean that it's not so > easy to design an intuitive and handy interface. i will look into it, i have seen tons of checks, maybe it is possible to divise a strategy. > > 1. match ip unused and log or drop > > 2. match some scans using --tcp-flags

Re: Stange ip_conntrack (newnat) behaviour.

2002-06-03 Thread Jozsef Kadlecsik
Hi, On Sun, 2 Jun 2002, A. van Schie wrote: > I saw something strange that I think comes from ip_conntrack. > > I'm using conntrack-state to filter my packets. > A simple version of my rules look like this: > iptables -A OUTPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT > iptables -A OUT

Re: about REJECT target

2002-06-03 Thread Andras Kis-Szabo
Hi Chen, > Now the IPv6 version of REJECT target doesn't support --reject-with > tcp-reset, right? > I have improved it to support tcp-reset. > Are you interested in the improvement? Harald wrote the REJECT6 target, and the IPv6 - somewhere - belongs to me. I saved Your patch, and I will check i