Mr. Josefsson,
--- Martin Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-04-21 at 00:21, Brad Chapman wrote:
> > Everyone,
> >
> > In the current CVS repository, the 0-newnat13.patch appears to have
> > been very badly broken - it doesn't apply at all to a fresh, untouched 2.4.18
> > ta
On Sun, 2002-04-21 at 00:21, Brad Chapman wrote:
> Everyone,
>
> In the current CVS repository, the 0-newnat13.patch appears to have
> been very badly broken - it doesn't apply at all to a fresh, untouched 2.4.18
> tarball. About three days ago, the patch was OK. Has something been corrupte
Everyone,
In the current CVS repository, the 0-newnat13.patch appears to have
been very badly broken - it doesn't apply at all to a fresh, untouched 2.4.18
tarball. About three days ago, the patch was OK. Has something been corrupted
in the 2.4.18 tarballs, the patch, both, or neither?
T
Hello, [EMAIL PROTECTED],As seen on NBC, CBS, CNN, and even Oprah!
The health discovery that actually reverses aging while burning
fat, without dieting or exercise! This proven discovery has
even been reported on by the New England Journal of Medicine.
Forget aging and dieting fo
2002-04-19 15:39:38+0200, Jozsef Kadlecsik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ->
> On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Joakim Axelsson wrote:
>
> > We would like to call this "border". Just the same as "filter INPUT", but
> > the absoluty first thing that happens after the packet comes from the
> > netcard-driver. Behaps a bo
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 03:21:40PM +0200, Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Harald Welte wrote:
>
> > No, I'm fine with that. However, we might also think about adding
> > debug output to the NAT code, since paket manipulations are done without
> > any rule matching (after the first
