On Sat, 2016-12-03 at 23:07 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet
>
> 1) Old code was hard to maintain, due to complex lock chains.
>(We probably will be able to remove some kfree_rcu() in callers)
>
> 2) Using a single timer to update all estimators does not
From: Eric Dumazet
1) Old code was hard to maintain, due to complex lock chains.
(We probably will be able to remove some kfree_rcu() in callers)
2) Using a single timer to update all estimators does not scale.
3) Code was buggy on 32bit kernel (WRITE_ONCE() on 64bit
From: Eric Dumazet
1) Old code was hard to maintain, due to complex lock chains.
(We probably will be able to remove some kfree_rcu() in callers)
2) Using a single timer to update all estimators does not scale.
3) Code was buggy on 32bit kernel (WRITE_ONCE() on 64bit
From: Liping Zhang
Otherwise, DHCP Discover packets(0.0.0.0->255.255.255.255) may be
dropped incorrectly.
Signed-off-by: Liping Zhang
---
net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_rpfilter.c | 8 +---
net/ipv4/netfilter/nft_fib_ipv4.c | 13 +++--
2 files
kbuild test robot wrote:
> All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
>In file included from include/uapi/linux/stddef.h:1:0,
> from include/linux/stddef.h:4,
> from include/uapi/linux/posix_types.h:4,
> from