On Thu, 2017-01-26 at 20:19 +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> Right. This is not percpu as in IPv4.
>
> I can send a follow up patch to get this in sync with the way we do it
> in IPv4, ie. add percpu socket.
>
> Fine with this approach? Thanks!
Not really.
percpu sockets are going to slow dow
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:02:40AM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-01-26 at 17:37 +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > From: Pau Espin Pedrol
> >
> > Otherwise, RST packets generated by the TCP stack for non-existing
> > sockets always have mark 0.
> > The mark from the original packet i
On Thu, 2017-01-26 at 17:37 +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> From: Pau Espin Pedrol
>
> Otherwise, RST packets generated by the TCP stack for non-existing
> sockets always have mark 0.
> The mark from the original packet is assigned to the netns_ipv4/6
> socket used to send the response so that
From: Pau Espin Pedrol
Otherwise, RST packets generated by the TCP stack for non-existing
sockets always have mark 0.
The mark from the original packet is assigned to the netns_ipv4/6
socket used to send the response so that it can get copied into the
response skb when the socket sends it.
Fixes