Re: [PATCH 2/2] netfilter: add missing macro

On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 05:29:11PM +0100, Eric Engestrom wrote: > Signed-off-by: Eric Engestrom > --- > > This can't compile without this macro… Is this header really used by anyone? > Should it be removed, to avoid bit-rot? Probably better to define something like:

Re: [PATCH 2/2] netfilter: add missing macro

Hi, [auto build test WARNING on linux-nvdimm/libnvdimm-for-next] [also build test WARNING on v4.7-rc6 next-20160708] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url:

[PATCH 2/2] netfilter: add missing macro

Signed-off-by: Eric Engestrom --- This can't compile without this macro… Is this header really used by anyone? Should it be removed, to avoid bit-rot? --- include/uapi/linux/netfilter/xt_sctp.h | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git