Thanks Florian!
I'll send a v2 addressing the comments.
Ahmed
On Tue, 21 Aug 2018 18:13:08 +0200
Florian Westphal wrote:
> Ahmed Abdelsalam wrote:
> > +static int seg6_check(const struct xt_tgchk_param *par)
> > +{
> > + /**
> > +* In the future, some new action may require using
> > +
Ahmed Abdelsalam wrote:
> +static int seg6_check(const struct xt_tgchk_param *par)
> +{
> + /**
> + * In the future, some new action may require using
> + * this function for doing some checks
> + */
Please add add a check on seg6->action and return -EOPNOSTUPP
in case it
We depend on IPV6_SEG6_LWTUNNEL only to be sure that three sympols
seg6_get_srh(), seg6_advance_nextseg(), and seg6_lookup_nexthop exist.
On the other hand, the actions go-next, skip-next, and go-last are
based the ip6tables SRH match of previous, next and last sid.
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 04:51:42PM +0200, Ahmed Abdelsalam wrote:
[...]
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/netfilter/Kconfig b/net/ipv6/netfilter/Kconfig
> index 339d0762b027..a2502c54a837 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/netfilter/Kconfig
> +++ b/net/ipv6/netfilter/Kconfig
> @@ -344,6 +344,21 @@ config
