Jack Ma wrote:
> Hi Florian,
>
> I attached two 'draft' patches in this email :)
>
> Thanks,
> Jack
> From 6d811e63c9c777ed4287bc4547134c99e939b49d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jack Ma
> Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 13:41:29 +1300
> Subject: [PATCH] libxt_CONNMARK: Support bit-shifting for --res
Hi Florian,
Do these patches looks acceptable for the mainline stream?
Any code comments will be appreciated !
Regards,
Jack--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kern
Hi Florian,
I attached two 'draft' patches in this email :)
Thanks,
JackFrom 6d811e63c9c777ed4287bc4547134c99e939b49d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jack Ma
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 13:41:29 +1300
Subject: [PATCH] libxt_CONNMARK: Support bit-shifting for --restore,set and
save-mark
Added bit-shi
Jack Ma wrote:
> Our current condition is:
>
> 1) only 0xfff0 (three F available in skb->mark), but 0xf000 (five F
> available in ct->mark)
>
> We wish to copy either 0xfff0 or 0x00fff000 from ct->mark into skb->mark,
>
>
> What about '-j CONNMARK --restore-mark --mask 0xf000
Hi Florian,
Our current condition is:
1) only 0xfff0 (three F available in skb->mark), but 0xf000 (five F
available in ct->mark)
We wish to copy either 0xfff0 or 0x00fff000 from ct->mark into skb->mark,
What about '-j CONNMARK --restore-mark --mask 0xf000 << 8 ( left shift 2
