Re: [GIT] Networking

Hi Dave, On Wed, 05 Oct 2016 22:56:12 -0400 (EDT) David Miller wrote: > > Yes, this is where the change got lost. No worries. > I have all of the fixups queued up in my net tree and will send in a pull > request later. Thanks. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell -- To

Re: [GIT] Networking

From: Stephen Rothwell Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2016 13:51:52 +1100 > On Wed, 5 Oct 2016 19:14:21 -0700 Linus Torvalds > wrote: >> >> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 5:52 PM, Stephen Rothwell >> wrote: >> > >> > Except that commit

Re: [GIT] Networking

Hi Linus, On Wed, 5 Oct 2016 19:14:21 -0700 Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 5:52 PM, Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > > > Except that commit effectively moved that function from > > net/netfilter/nf_tables_netdev.c to > >

Re: [GIT] Networking

On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 5:52 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Except that commit effectively moved that function from > net/netfilter/nf_tables_netdev.c to > include/net/netfilter/nf_tables_ipv4.h while commit c73c24849011 > ("netfilter: nf_tables_netdev: remove redundant

Re: [GIT] Networking

Hi Linus, On Wed, 5 Oct 2016 15:37:17 -0700 Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > > > I have been carrying the following merge fix patch (for the merge of > > the net-next tree with Linus'

Re: [GIT] Networking

From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2016 02:09:45 +0200 > On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 03:37:17PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Stephen Rothwell >> wrote: >> > >> > I have been carrying the following merge fix patch

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Netfilter fixes for net-next

From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2016 02:07:44 +0200 > This is a pull request to address fallout from previous nf-next pull > request, only fixes going on here: > > 1) Address a potential null dereference in nf_unregister_net_hook() >when becomes

Re: [GIT] Networking

On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 03:37:17PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > > > I have been carrying the following merge fix patch (for the merge of > > the net-next tree with Linus' tree) for a while now which seems to

[PATCH 5/5] netfilter: nft_limit: fix divided by zero panic

From: Liping Zhang After I input the following nftables rule, a panic happened on my system: # nft add rule filter OUTPUT limit rate 0xf bytes/second divide error: [#1] SMP [ ... ] RIP: 0010:[] [] nft_limit_pkt_bytes_eval+0x2e/0xa0

[PATCH 4/5] netfilter: fix namespace handling in nf_log_proc_dostring

From: Jann Horn nf_log_proc_dostring() used current's network namespace instead of the one corresponding to the sysctl file the write was performed on. Because the permission check happens at open time and the nf_log files in namespaces are accessible for the namespace owner,

[PATCH 3/5] netfilter: xt_hashlimit: Fix link error in 32bit arch because of 64bit division

From: Vishwanath Pai Division of 64bit integers will cause linker error undefined reference to `__udivdi3'. Fix this by replacing divisions with div64_64 Fixes: 11d5f15723c9 ("netfilter: xt_hashlimit: Create revision 2 to ...") Signed-off-by: Vishwanath Pai

[PATCH 1/5] netfilter: Fix potential null pointer dereference

From: Aaron Conole It's possible for nf_hook_entry_head to return NULL. If two nf_unregister_net_hook calls happen simultaneously with a single hook entry in the list, both will enter the nf_hook_mutex critical section. The first will successfully delete the head, but the

[PATCH 2/5] netfilter: accommodate different kconfig in nf_set_hooks_head

From: Aaron Conole When CONFIG_NETFILTER_INGRESS is unset (or no), we need to handle the request for registration properly by dropping the hook. This releases the entry during the set. Fixes: e3b37f11e6e4 ("netfilter: replace list_head with single linked list")

[PATCH 0/5] Netfilter fixes for net-next

Hi David, This is a pull request to address fallout from previous nf-next pull request, only fixes going on here: 1) Address a potential null dereference in nf_unregister_net_hook() when becomes nf_hook_entry_head is NULL, from Aaron Conole. 2) Missing ifdef for CONFIG_NETFILTER_INGRESS,

Re: [GIT] Networking

On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > I have been carrying the following merge fix patch (for the merge of > the net-next tree with Linus' tree) for a while now which seems to have > got missed: Ugh. It doesn't seem to be a merge error, because that

Re: [GIT] Networking

Hi Linus, Dave, On Wed, 05 Oct 2016 01:44:37 -0400 (EDT) David Miller wrote: > I have been carrying the following merge fix patch (for the merge of the net-next tree with Linus' tree) for a while now which seems to have got missed: From: Stephen Rothwell

Re: error: 'struct net_device' has no member named 'nf_hooks_ingress'

On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 22:56 +0200, Michal Sojka wrote: > this commit is now in mainline as > e3b37f11e6e4e6b6f02cc762f182ce233d2c1c9d and it breaks my build: > > net/netfilter/core.c: In function 'nf_set_hooks_head': > net/netfilter/core.c:96:3: error: 'struct net_device' has no member

error: 'struct net_device' has no member named 'nf_hooks_ingress'

Hi, On Tue, Oct 04 2016, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > On (09/27/16 19:03), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: >> Hello, >> >> On (09/27/16 16:40), Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> > >> > Changes since 20160923: >> > >> >> seems that commit e3b37f11e6e4e6b6 ("netfilter: replace list_head with >> single linked