On 2017-03-03 13:45, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > > Perhaps I'm missing something here, but let me ask again, how does
> > > userspace distinguish between an unset nfmark and a nfmark of
> > > 0x?
> >
> > It can't.
>
> It can if you log it as
On 2017-03-03 14:22, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 7:45 AM, Florian Westphal wrote:
> > > Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > >> > Perhaps I'm missing something here, but let me ask again, how does
> > >> >
Paul Moore wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 7:45 AM, Florian Westphal wrote:
> > Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> >> > Perhaps I'm missing something here, but let me ask again, how does
> >> > userspace distinguish between an unset nfmark and a
Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > Perhaps I'm missing something here, but let me ask again, how does
> > userspace distinguish between an unset nfmark and a nfmark of
> > 0x?
>
> It can't.
It can if you log it as 0, as I asked in patch 1 review.
(You wouldn't log sk uid of
On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Paul Moore wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 7:45 AM, Florian Westphal wrote:
>> > Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
>> >> > Perhaps I'm missing something here, but let me ask
On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 7:45 AM, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
>> > Perhaps I'm missing something here, but let me ask again, how does
>> > userspace distinguish between an unset nfmark and a nfmark of
>> > 0x?
>>
>> It can't.
>
> It
On 2017-03-02 21:54, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 9:00 PM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > On 2017-03-02 19:16, Paul Moore wrote:
> >> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> >> > On 2017-03-01 17:19, Paul Moore wrote:
> >> >> On
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 9:00 PM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> On 2017-03-02 19:16, Paul Moore wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
>> > On 2017-03-01 17:19, Paul Moore wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 11:28 AM, Richard Guy Briggs
On 2017-03-02 19:16, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > On 2017-03-01 17:19, Paul Moore wrote:
> >> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 11:28 AM, Richard Guy Briggs
> >> wrote:
> >> > On 2017-02-28 17:22, Paul Moore wrote:
> >>
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> On 2017-03-01 17:19, Paul Moore wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 11:28 AM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
>> > On 2017-02-28 17:22, Paul Moore wrote:
>> >> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Richard Guy Briggs
On 2017-03-01 17:19, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 11:28 AM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > On 2017-02-28 17:22, Paul Moore wrote:
> >> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Richard Guy Briggs
> >> wrote:
> >> > Eliminate flipping in and out of message
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 11:28:02AM -0500, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> On 2017-02-28 17:22, Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > > Eliminate flipping in and out of message fields, dropping fields in the
> > > process.
> > >
> > >
On 2017-02-28 17:22, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > Eliminate flipping in and out of message fields, dropping fields in the
> > process.
> >
> > Sample raw message format IPv4 UDP:
> > type=NETFILTER_PKT
Eliminate flipping in and out of message fields, dropping fields in the process.
Sample raw message format IPv4 UDP:
type=NETFILTER_PKT msg=audit(1487874761.386:228): mark=0xae8a2732
saddr=127.0.0.1 daddr=127.0.0.1 proto=17^]
Sample raw message format IPv6 ICMP6:
type=NETFILTER_PKT
14 matches
Mail list logo