On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 11:24:00PM +1200, Xin Long wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 10:33 PM, Pablo Neira Ayuso
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 12:02:20PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> >> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 08:39:44PM +1200, Xin Long wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 7:33 AM, Con
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 10:33 PM, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 12:02:20PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 08:39:44PM +1200, Xin Long wrote:
>> > On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 7:33 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
>> > > On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 7:33 PM, Xin Long wrote
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 12:02:20PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 08:39:44PM +1200, Xin Long wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 7:33 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 7:33 PM, Xin Long wrote:
> > >> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Cong Wang
> > >> wrote
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 08:39:44PM +1200, Xin Long wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 7:33 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 7:33 PM, Xin Long wrote:
> >> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
> >>> This looks like a completely API burden?
> >> netfilter xt targets are not
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 5:57 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 1:39 AM, Xin Long wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 7:33 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 7:33 PM, Xin Long wrote:
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
> This looks like a completely
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 1:39 AM, Xin Long wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 7:33 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 7:33 PM, Xin Long wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
This looks like a completely API burden?
>>> netfilter xt targets are not really compa
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 7:33 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 7:33 PM, Xin Long wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
>>> This looks like a completely API burden?
>> netfilter xt targets are not really compatible with netsched action.
>> I've got to say, the patc
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 7:33 PM, Xin Long wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
>> This looks like a completely API burden?
> netfilter xt targets are not really compatible with netsched action.
> I've got to say, the patch is just a way to make checkentry return
> false and av
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
> (Cc'ing netfilter and Jamal)
>
> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 4:35 AM, Xin Long wrote:
>> As we know in some target's checkentry it may dereference par.entryinfo
>> to check entry stuff inside. But when sched action calls xt_check_target,
>> par.entryi
(Cc'ing netfilter and Jamal)
On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 4:35 AM, Xin Long wrote:
> As we know in some target's checkentry it may dereference par.entryinfo
> to check entry stuff inside. But when sched action calls xt_check_target,
> par.entryinfo is set with NULL. It would cause kernel panic when cal
10 matches
Mail list logo
