2018-07-09 22:48 GMT+09:00 Pablo Neira Ayuso :
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 11:40:06PM +0900, Taehee Yoo wrote:
>> 2018-07-03 19:20 GMT+09:00 Pablo Neira Ayuso :
>> > On Sun, Jul 01, 2018 at 08:44:52PM +0900, Taehee Yoo wrote:
>> >> This patch fixes below.
>> >> 1. check null pointer of rb_next.
>>
On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 11:40:06PM +0900, Taehee Yoo wrote:
> 2018-07-03 19:20 GMT+09:00 Pablo Neira Ayuso :
> > On Sun, Jul 01, 2018 at 08:44:52PM +0900, Taehee Yoo wrote:
> >> This patch fixes below.
> >> 1. check null pointer of rb_next.
> >> rb_next can return null. so null check routine
2018-07-03 19:20 GMT+09:00 Pablo Neira Ayuso :
> On Sun, Jul 01, 2018 at 08:44:52PM +0900, Taehee Yoo wrote:
>> This patch fixes below.
>> 1. check null pointer of rb_next.
>> rb_next can return null. so null check routine should be added.
>> 2. check whether an interval flags is set or not.
>>
On Sun, Jul 01, 2018 at 08:44:52PM +0900, Taehee Yoo wrote:
> This patch fixes below.
> 1. check null pointer of rb_next.
> rb_next can return null. so null check routine should be added.
> 2. check whether an interval flags is set or not.
> If interval flags is given, both a start node and a
This patch fixes below.
1. check null pointer of rb_next.
rb_next can return null. so null check routine should be added.
2. check whether an interval flags is set or not.
If interval flags is given, both a start node and a end node
should be removed at once. If interval flags it not given,
is