Hi Dave!
Unloading ipt_ULOG can cause kernel oops if some timers are still pending
while module unload happens.
The following patch fixes this bug.
Please apply,
Thanks
--- linuxppc-benh-100402-plain/net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_ULOG.cSat Apr 6 12:30:04
2002
+++
changing the PREFIX: in the main Makefile does not compile correctly, as
there is another definition in the file iptables.c, line 43:
IPT_LIB_DIR
which is not defined in the main Makefile. The definition in the Makefile is
similar and this seems to be a bug:
IPT_LIBDIR
compiling with a
Mr. Andreasson,
--- Oskar Andreasson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I have a brief suggestion for a match/target which I am unable to to write myself
of many reasons, mainly that I am a very very lousy coder =). If someone is
already working on this, disregard from this mail.
What I
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 11:21:58AM +0200, Joachim Schwender wrote:
changing the PREFIX: in the main Makefile does not compile correctly, as
there is another definition in the file iptables.c, line 43:
IPT_LIB_DIR
this definition is only getting active if IPT_LIB_DIR is not defined.
which
Hello,
begin Norbert Sendetzky quotation:
Hi all
I have two suggestions for your very nice netfilter framework:
First of all it would be nice if the multiport match would accept not
only single ports but also port ranges. This would streamline the
whole thing a little bit. I don't
Hi,
what is the policy/correct bahavior about this filed in a 'mac' module?
When (and why) can I use this?
An example: I get a packet (ipv6) with an option header. It contains the
type and the length. When I analyzes the packet, i have to jump to the
next header with this length offset, and
Mr. Andras,
--- Andras Kis-Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
what is the policy/correct bahavior about this filed in a 'mac' module?
When (and why) can I use this?
An example: I get a packet (ipv6) with an option header. It contains the
type and the length. When I analyzes the packet,
Hi,
I am a newbie for netfilter and is planing a SIP enabled module with netfilter,
but some question puzzled me.
10.10.1.2¡ª¡ª159.226.1.1¡ª¡ª159.226.1.2¡ª¡ª10.10.2.2
A--B£¨GW:10.10.1.1)--C(GW:10.10.2.1)D
A(159.226.1.1:1)
D(159.226.1.2:1)
There are two NATs,
Hi,
(sorry,last mail can't be seen,so I send it
twice)
I am a newbie for netfilter and is planing a SIP enabled
module with netfilter,but some question puzzled me.
10.10.1.2¡ª¡ª159.226.1.1¡ª¡ª159.226.1.2¡ª¡ª10.10.2.2
