Hi,
Ladislav Lhotka lho...@nic.cz wrote:
Hi,
although YANG 1.1 issue Y26 [1] is marked as DONE, I think the adopted
solution Y26-02 is really horrible, so at least I want to make sure the
WG is aware of the consequences.
I am currently working on a data model for DNS zone data and the
On 11/08/2015 08:38, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
On 10 Aug 2015, at 22:15, Andy Bierman a...@yumaworks.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) a...@cisco.com wrote:
I think there is agreement that there is a problem. The YANG Routing Design
Team is addressing this with
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Robert Wilton rwil...@cisco.com wrote:
On 11/08/2015 08:38, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
On 10 Aug 2015, at 22:15, Andy Bierman a...@yumaworks.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) a...@cisco.com
wrote:
I think there is agreement
Hi -
From: Andy Bierman
Sent: Aug 18, 2015 10:22 AM
To: Robert Wilton
Cc: NETMOD Working Group
Subject: Re: [netmod] Y34 - root node
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Robert Wilton rwil...@cisco.com wrote:
...
I think that having fixed paths may end up being too restrictive.
This is how
[Adding authors and RTG WG.]
Hi Andy,
I'm not sure who you are looking to hear from as you addressed this
mail to the netmod list. I'm happy to give my opinion as it seems you
might have been aiming this at the draft authors. (but then again
perhaps not.)
On 8/18/2015 8:01 PM, Andy Bierman
Hi,
I assume this draft is what we should be reviewing and not
the obsolete openconfig draft?
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-device-model-00
Q1) scope
sec 2:
The model organization can itself be thought of as a meta-model,
in that it describes the relationships
Tom,
this may be a useful read...
https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/interim-meetings-2000-08-29.html
/js
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 08:51:07AM -0400, Nadeau Thomas wrote:
BTW Benoit’s note below and the WebEx should serve as the official
notification to the WG that we will be having
Ladislav Lhotka lho...@nic.cz wrote:
On 18 Aug 2015, at 15:42, Martin Bjorklund m...@tail-f.com wrote:
Ladislav Lhotka lho...@nic.cz wrote:
On 18 Aug 2015, at 13:09, Martin Bjorklund m...@tail-f.com wrote:
Hi,
Ladislav Lhotka lho...@nic.cz wrote:
Hi,
although YANG
On 18 Aug 2015, at 15:42, Martin Bjorklund m...@tail-f.com wrote:
Ladislav Lhotka lho...@nic.cz wrote:
On 18 Aug 2015, at 13:09, Martin Bjorklund m...@tail-f.com wrote:
Hi,
Ladislav Lhotka lho...@nic.cz wrote:
Hi,
although YANG 1.1 issue Y26 [1] is marked as DONE, I think the
