Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 03:07:41PM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> > Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 10:35:48AM +0200, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> > > > Martin
Andy Bierman writes:
> Hi,
>
> I buy Martin's argument that "when" stmt is like "choice".
> The draft says exactly what will happen if the constraint
> is not satisfied. Why don't we require the client to delete
> the old case and create the new case all at once?
>
> The
Final agenda posted:
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/94/agenda/agenda-94-netmod
- don’t forget to refresh your cache ;)
Thanks,
Kent
From: netmod > on
behalf of Kent Watsen >
Date:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 4:55 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 03:07:41PM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> > > Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> > > >
A theme that appears to have been running through the discussion of languages
like YANG since (at least) 2007 (see draft-schoenw-sming-lessons-01, section
3.1) is that “preference should be give to solutions that simplify the task of
readers. Reduction of the efforts required by writers is of
> On 26 Oct 2015, at 16:10, Andy Bierman wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 4:55 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 03:07:41PM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
>
Hi,
Last week I posted slightly revised version of both
draft-wilton-netmod-intf-ext-yang-01 and
draft-wilton-netmod-intf-vlan-yang-01. Any feedback on any of the
models contained within these two drafts is very welcome, but I would be
particularly interested in any opinions regarding some
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 8:57 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>
> > On 26 Oct 2015, at 16:10, Andy Bierman wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 4:55 AM, Martin Bjorklund
> wrote:
> > Juergen Schoenwaelder