Re: [netmod] NETMOD WG Virtual Interim Meeting: 22 February 2016

> From: Kent Watsen, February 23, 2016 7:19 PM > > Hi Eric, > > If you have a proposal, please send. A draft seems overkill to me, but maybe > you > have something in mind? I have only the beginnings of a division of terminology and function in mind. I would put time into this should people

Re: [netmod] NETMOD WG Virtual Interim Meeting: 22 February 2016

Hi Kent, Thanks for running the interim, I agree it was quite useful. One thing I wanted to pull out from the minutes was the overall definition of "Mount". Right now there are 830 web pages on the OpenDaylight site which refer to "Mount" in terms of Peer Mount (i.e., something much

[netmod] working group secretary position

All, We are considering whether to fill the open working group secretary position. Working Group secretaries help with Working Group administrative tasks, and are typically responsible for: * producing draft meeting notes based on attending the actual meeting, or listening to recordings (or

Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-06

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft Clyde On 2/22/16, 5:22 PM, "Lou Berger" wrote: >Authors, Contributors, WG, > >As part of the preparation for WG Last Call > >Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above? > >Please state either: >

[netmod] explicit mount

Hi, In yesterday's meeting, Lou (I think?) mentioned a use case for mount that is not documented in draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-device-model; the need for being able to specify modules to mount directly in the schema. Something like this: container root { ymnt:mount-point "lne" {

Re: [netmod] Broadband Forum intention of using ietf-entity YANG module

Benoit Claise wrote: > Dear all, > > It would be great if we can receive a status update on the Entity YANG > model from the design team. The design team is waiting for the WG to decide on adoption of the document. Last time this was discussed I think the chairs said that