Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-bjorklund-netmod-structural-mount-02 as draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount

Support. Thanks, Chris. Lou Berger writes: > All, > > This is start of a two week poll on making > draft-bjorklund-netmod-structural-mount-02 a working group document with > the name draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount. > > This adoption is a little bit unusual in that, per our

[netmod] Protocol Action: 'Defining and Using Metadata with YANG' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-netmod-yang-metadata-07.txt)

The IESG has approved the following document: - 'Defining and Using Metadata with YANG' (draft-ietf-netmod-yang-metadata-07.txt) as Proposed Standard This document is the product of the NETCONF Data Modeling Language Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Benoit Claise and Joel Jaeggli.

[netmod] Draft agenda posted

Hi, A draft agenda for BA has been posted at https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/95/agenda/agenda-95-netmod . Please review and let us know if we've missed something. Our schedule may look a bit unusual as we received more time than we requested, and there's a snack break in the middle of our

Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-metadata-07.txt

Hi, compared to -06, there is only one change: following Stephen Farrell's comment, I added this sentence to Security Considerations: It is RECOMMENDED that security-sensitive or privacy-sensitive data be modeled as regular YANG data nodes rather than annotations. Lada > On 21 Mar 2016, at

[netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-metadata-07.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the NETCONF Data Modeling Language of the IETF. Title : Defining and Using Metadata with YANG Author : Ladislav Lhotka Filename:

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-bjorklund-netmod-structural-mount-02 as draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount

Support. Rob On 21/03/2016 16:17, Lou Berger wrote: All, This is start of a two week poll on making draft-bjorklund-netmod-structural-mount-02 a working group document with the name draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount. This adoption is a little bit unusual in that, per our last interim, we know

[netmod] WG adoption poll draft-bjorklund-netmod-structural-mount-02 as draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount

All, This is start of a two week poll on making draft-bjorklund-netmod-structural-mount-02 a working group document with the name draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount. This adoption is a little bit unusual in that, per our last interim, we know that this document is likely to see significant changes

Re: [netmod] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-json-09: (with COMMENT)

the zerotouch draft uses object signing. XMLSIG was used in earlier draft, but was replaced with a binary type leaf called 'signature' having the following description: description "A PKCS #7 SignedData structure as specified by RFC

Re: [netmod] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-json-09: (with COMMENT)

Hi Juergen, I think there is a miscommunication: On 3/21/16 4:43 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: >> However this goes, it should be well documented somewhere. This will >> not be the first time this comes up (he says, knowingly). >> > I am somewhat surprised. Do people really expect that

Re: [netmod] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-metadata-06: (with COMMENT)

Stephen Farrell writes: > > -- > COMMENT: > -- > > > Section 9: You could maybe add a sentence recommending > to not store security or

Re: [netmod] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-json-09: (with COMMENT)

On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 04:30:03PM +0100, Eliot Lear wrote: > > > On 3/21/16 4:19 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > > Lada, I think Stephen asks about JSON encoded YANG-defined data that > > is signed, that is, the JSON serialization itself is signed. What > > happens to the signature if you

Re: [netmod] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-json-09: (with COMMENT)

On 3/21/16 4:19 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > Lada, I think Stephen asks about JSON encoded YANG-defined data that > is signed, that is, the JSON serialization itself is signed. What > happens to the signature if you convert the JSON to corresponding XML > serialization. I think the answer

Re: [netmod] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-json-09: (with COMMENT)

On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 04:07:07PM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > - I'm not sure if anyone has considered XMLDSIG or use of JOSE > > with YANG. If one did, then this kind of mapping would not > > allow one to preserve digital signatures without a lot of > > work. I assume that that's

Re: [netmod] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-json-09: (with COMMENT)

Hi Stephen, thanks for your comments, please see my responses inline. Stephen Farrell writes: > -- > COMMENT: > -- > > > - I would

[netmod] draft-bjorklund-netmod-structural-mount: Namespace issues

Hi, if I understand correctly netmod-structural-mount inlines "mounted" data directly to container / list which is used, which brings up following issues: 1. It is possible to have identifier conflict between data from model defining mount and mounted data (if mounted schema contains same