Re: [netmod] NETMOD SYSLOG YANG Model / additional attributes

Dmytro, RFC 5424 The Syslog Protocol, defines the message format for syslog messages and the proposed ietf-syslog.yang model supports both free form and structured data format Syslog messages as specified by RFC 5424. TIMESTAMP is described in section 6.2.3 of the RFC. Sequence number could be

Re: [netmod] Opstate solutions discussions: update and request for WGinput

On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Kent Watsen wrote: > > > Right, that would be “updating” it, and RESTCONF would need a similar > thing. My point, and I think Tom’s too, is that it makes sense that the > NETCONF (not NETMOD) WG do the protocol mapping work. Do you

Re: [netmod] Opstate solutions discussions: update and request for WGinput

On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 7:53 AM, Kent Watsen wrote: > [as a contributor] > > > > So, I see a strong preference for Option B which is all very logical, as > Acee points out. But Option B I see as being a fundamental change to > RFC6241, so if the netmod WG takes that

Re: [netmod] Opstate solutions discussions: update and request for WGinput

[as a contributor] So, I see a strong preference for Option B which is all very logical, as Acee points out. But Option B I see as being a fundamental change to RFC6241, so if the netmod WG takes that decision, then it is stamping on the netconf WG. Perhaps the WG should be merged, now that

Re: [netmod] Opstate solutions discussions: update and request for WGinput

[as a contributor] I’m for ‘B’ as well, in case it wasn’t obvious from [2] (Lou’s ref below). Kent From: "Kiran Koushik Agrahara Sreenivasa (kkoushik)" Date: Friday, June 17, 2016 at 2:36 PM To: Lou Berger Cc: "netmod-cha...@ietf.org"

Re: [netmod] Next NETMOD chair

Thanks for the splendid job done, Juergen! Regards, Dan > -Original Message- > From: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ersue, > Mehmet (Nokia - DE/Munich) > Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2016 11:52 PM > To: Bert Wijnen (IETF); Benoit Claise; NETMOD Working Group; Juergen

Re: [netmod] Canonical order: linkage and meta

I think changing the canonical format because some people may miss the copyright since they have to scroll down a bit is not really worth the pain of having different canonical formats out there. And something like // please scroll down to see the license does seem to sovle the problem. /js

[netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification-02.txt posted

Dear all, We have posted draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification version 2 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification/ We believe that we have addressed all the open issues, and that this draft is ready for WGLC. Regards, Carl, Dean, and Benoit

Re: [netmod] Canonical order: linkage and meta

All, No-one replied to this. Fair enough, because it probably seems a rather trivial question! But I wanted to point out that a practical consequence of the description being a long way down a module is that the license text could easily be missed (assuming it’s in the top-level description,

Re: [netmod] Next NETMOD chair

> On 25 Jun 2016, at 22:23, Benoit Claise wrote: > > Dear all, > > As discussed with Jürgen Schönwälder some time ago, Jürgen decided to remain > a NETMOD chair until YANG 1.1 was done. That milestone is now reached: the > document is in the RFC-editor queue. > Today,