Re: [netmod] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-10.txt

> On Apr 7, 2017, at 4:33 PM, Kent Watsen wrote: > > On 3/28/17, 2:59 PM, "David Bannister" > wrote: > > I would agree that the mix of L2 and L3 in the same operational ACL is a bit > out of the ordinary. I could see where a

Re: [netmod] Query on Announcing Conformance Information in the Message

On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Kent Watsen wrote: > Is there a typo in your capability line? s/netocnf/netconf/ > > Is your server also advertising jnx-ietf-netocnf-monitoring-dev in its > hello message? > > > > BTW, be aware that servers supporting RFC7950 no longer have

Re: [netmod] Query on Announcing Conformance Information in the Message

On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 6:36 AM, Dhirendra Trivedi wrote: > Hi All, > > > > We had requirement of implementing ietf-netconf-monitoring YANG model > > and we did it but partially. Now we need to advertise the deviation module > > in the netconf server capability. > > I

Re: [netmod] Query on Announcing Conformance Information in the Message

Is there a typo in your capability line? s/netocnf/netconf/ Is your server also advertising jnx-ietf-netocnf-monitoring-dev in its hello message? BTW, be aware that servers supporting RFC7950 no longer have "deviations=" in the capability string, as the server is now expected to use YANG

[netmod] Query on Announcing Conformance Information in the Message

Hi All, We had requirement of implementing ietf-netconf-monitoring YANG model and we did it but partially. Now we need to advertise the deviation module in the netconf server capability. I tried doing it like

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-lhotka-netmod-yang-markup-00

Kent Watsen writes: > All, > > We're a couple days away from the 2-week window. As of now, the > majority does not support adopting this draft. Any remaining > opinions? > > > Lada, > > The objections seem to be concern for net readability, and for the > importance of the

Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-bjorklund-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. Lou On April 19, 2017 6:33:14 PM Kent Watsen wrote: Authors, Contributors, WG, As part of preparation for WG Adoption of: draft-bjorklund-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams Are you aware of any IPR that applies to

Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-bjorklund-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams

Kent Watsen wrote: > Authors, Contributors, WG, > > As part of preparation for WG Adoption of: > draft-bjorklund-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams > > Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above? No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft