Hi,
I am aware how YANG identities work.
Let the market decide. Good enough.
Andy
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Phil Shafer wrote:
> Andy Bierman writes:
> >The YANG definitions defined for NETCONF and RESTCONF operations do not
> actually
> >require the "real"
Andy Bierman writes:
>The YANG definitions defined for NETCONF and RESTCONF operations do not
>actually
>require the "real" datastore identities to be used by a server.
The identities are defined in the YANG modules contained in the
NMDA draft (draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores). The
> Do we need to call this/these scenarios out directly
> in the NMDA draft? Or is this more of an FAQ item?
I support putting it in the NMDA draft. Already I looked for an
example in the Appendix, which I thought might be there, given
how often I know the NMDA-authors discussed it. But,
"Sterne, Jason (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)" writes:
> OK - so the same leaf (in the schema) has the same value space in the
> conventional datastores and in the operational datastore. That probably
> makes sense since a single schema describes the model for that leaf
> whether it is accessed in
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 1:07 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder <
j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 01:01:29PM -0700, Andy Bierman wrote:
> >
> > The YANG identityref allows any identity that is derived from the
> > same base. You keep talking about "the" operational
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 01:01:29PM -0700, Andy Bierman wrote:
>
> The YANG identityref allows any identity that is derived from the
> same base. You keep talking about "the" operational datastore when
> in fact your YANG definitions require no such thing. They merely
> require any identify with
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 12:47 PM, Kent Watsen wrote:
>
>
>
>
> > I am still concerned that the datastore conformance requirements are
>
> > under-specified and too server-centric.
>
>
>
> Okay.
>
>
>
>
>
> > The YANG definitions defined for NETCONF and RESTCONF operations
>
> I am still concerned that the datastore conformance requirements are
> under-specified and too server-centric.
Okay.
> The YANG definitions defined for NETCONF and RESTCONF operations
> do not actually require the "real" datastore identities to be used by a
> server.
> The server
OK – so the same leaf (in the schema) has the same value space in the
conventional datastores and in the operational datastore. That probably makes
sense since a single schema describes the model for that leaf whether it is
accessed in conventional DSes or the operational DS.
But I think that