Re: [netmod] Query about augmenting module from submodule in YANG 1.0

Hello, IMO "submodule"s are a striking example of redundant complexity in an otherwise very close to perfection YANG (regardless if it is YANG 1.0 or 1.1). Modules and submodules have been around for a while however the ratio of the currently published modules compared with the submodules

[netmod] ietf 99 minutes posted

The minutes for the IETF 99 NETMOD sessions have been posted. https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/99/materials/minutes-99-netmod Thank-you Michael for reviewing the recordings to ensure completeness and accuracy! Kent ___ netmod mailing list

Re: [netmod] Query about augmenting module from submodule in YANG 1.0

Hi Jan, Thanks – we’ll look at trying to put everything into submodules in this case. Regards, William From: Jan Lindblad [mailto:j...@tail-f.com] Sent: 07 August 2017 14:28 To: Ivory, William Cc: netmod@ietf.org Subject: Re: [netmod] Query about augmenting module from

Re: [netmod] Query about augmenting module from submodule in YANG 1.0

The submodule concept in YANG 1.0 is, well, not very useful, and even less intuitive. That's why it saw major rework in YANG 1.1. A YANG 1.0 submodule cannot reference the module that includes it, directly or indirectly. This is because in YANG 1.0 the symbols in other submodules of the same