Re: [netmod] Question/Clarification of ietf-netmod-entity model

A logical entity in the ENTITY-MIB boils down to the SNMP parameters needed to talk to an SNMP agent that provides a context view on say a bridge. This all was needed because the original bridge MIB module design was not prepared to expose virtual lans, multiple spanning trees etc. I assume that

Re: [netmod] Query about augmenting module from submodule in YANG 1.0

Hi, I'm not Rob, but my understanding is that if a module author wanted to migrate to YANG 2.0, they could merge their submodules back into the main module - which is not a difficult procedure and does not break compatibility with clients. Alex From:

Re: [netmod] Pattern statements [was Re: Query about augmenting module from submodule in YANG 1.0]

Hi Rob, I’m fine with simplifying (even if the resultant pattern is much less impressive ;^). I’ve copied the BESS WG to see if there are any objections. Thanks, Acee From: "Robert Wilton -X (rwilton - ENSOFT LIMITED at Cisco)" > Date: Monday, August

Re: [netmod] rfc6087bis S4.23 replacement text

Kent/WG,     This seems a bit terse to me and not provide needed guidance during the current transition period.  I understood  the discussion ended up  with the options being to either (1) provide the guidance as a standalone document, e.g., (a)-(s) in draft-dsdt-nmda-guidelines, with a pointer

[netmod] Question/Clarification of ietf-netmod-entity model

RFC6933 Entity MIB contains the following tables: * entPhysicalContainsTable (this is modeled in ietf-hardware-yang module) * entLPPhysicalTable (describes the mapping of logical entities and physical components supporting that entity). There are some solution spaces that need to

[netmod] rfc6087bis S4.23 replacement text

Hi, During the meeting in Chicago, the NMDA authors took an action to propose some text for S4.23. After a little review, the following emerged. Yes, it's short, but was anything left anything out? =START= 4.23 Operational Data Operational data includes both config "false" nodes

Re: [netmod] Query about augmenting module from submodule in YANG 1.0

Acee, Rob,     Can you propose a specific change/addition to 6087Bis? Thanks, Lou On 8/21/2017 10:01 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: > Hi William, Rob, Andy, > > Given their limited usefulness and the detriments, perhaps we should > discourage the creation of new submodules in RFC6087Bis. > >

Re: [netmod] schema mount open issue #1

Hi Martin, See below. On 8/22/2017 6:20 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > Hi, > > Lada presented an open issue in schema mount in Prague. (See slide 6 > in > https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/99/materials/slides-99-netmod-sessb-schema-mount) > > The original problem comes from the NI use case >

Re: [netmod] schema mount open issue #1

"Acee Lindem (acee)" wrote: > Hi Martin, > > > On 8/22/17, 6:20 AM, "netmod on behalf of Martin Bjorklund" > wrote: > > >Hi, > > > >Lada presented an open issue in schema mount in Prague. (See slide 6 > >in >

Re: [netmod] schema mount open issue #1

Hi Martin, On 8/22/17, 6:20 AM, "netmod on behalf of Martin Bjorklund" wrote: >Hi, > >Lada presented an open issue in schema mount in Prague. (See slide 6 >in >https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/99/materials/slides-99-netmod-sessb-s

[netmod] schema mount open issue #1

Hi, Lada presented an open issue in schema mount in Prague. (See slide 6 in https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/99/materials/slides-99-netmod-sessb-schema-mount) The original problem comes from the NI use case (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model). In this use case,