[netmod] Fwd: Broadband Forum NMDA Questions

FYI - I don't see this yet at https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/ Forwarded Message Subject:Broadband Forum NMDA Questions Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 21:25:21 + From: David Sinicrope To: Lou Berger , Kent

Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-acee-netmod-rfc8022bis-02

I support adoption of this draft. I have reviewed draft-acee-netmod-rfc8022bis-02, and ask that the following comments be considered after the document has been adopted: 1. Does the draft still require a normative reference to 6020? Given that the modules are all YANG revision 1.1 perhaps

Re: [netmod] vs

On 19/09/2017 10:55, Martin Bjorklund wrote: Robert Wilton wrote: On 18/09/2017 19:25, Andy Bierman wrote: On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Martin Bjorklund > wrote: Juergen Schoenwaelder

Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree output

[...] I prefer that the (schema) tree format is restricted to show the schema tree. If a tree format is also needed for data trees, then this really is a different tree format. It may use a similar base notation but what it shows is fundamentally different. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc7227bis-00

On 19/09/2017 15:07, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: Robert Wilton píše v Út 19. 09. 2017 v 14:49 +0100: Hi Lada, On 19/09/2017 14:37, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: Martin Bjorklund writes: Ladislav Lhotka wrote: Hi, I support the adoption but I propose two conceptual

Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree output

On 9/19/2017 9:55 AM, Robert Wilton wrote: > > On 19/09/2017 14:47, Martin Bjorklund wrote: >> Robert Wilton wrote: >>> On 19/09/2017 14:28, Lou Berger wrote: On 9/19/2017 7:29 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > Lou Berger wrote: >> Martin, >>

Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree output

On 9/19/2017 9:42 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > Lou Berger wrote: >> >> On 9/19/2017 7:29 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote: >>> Lou Berger wrote: Martin, Speaking as a contributor: On 9/15/2017 7:40 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote: >

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc7227bis-00

Robert Wilton píše v Út 19. 09. 2017 v 14:49 +0100: > Hi Lada, > > > On 19/09/2017 14:37, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > Martin Bjorklund writes: > > > > > Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I support the adoption but I propose two conceptual

Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree output

On 19/09/2017 14:47, Martin Bjorklund wrote: Robert Wilton wrote: On 19/09/2017 14:28, Lou Berger wrote: On 9/19/2017 7:29 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote: Lou Berger wrote: Martin, Speaking as a contributor: On 9/15/2017 7:40 AM, Martin Bjorklund

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc7227bis-00

Hi Lada, On 19/09/2017 14:37, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: Martin Bjorklund writes: Ladislav Lhotka wrote: Hi, I support the adoption but I propose two conceptual changes: 1. Introduce a new module name and namespace so that it is not necessary to carry along

Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree output

On 19/09/2017 14:28, Lou Berger wrote: On 9/19/2017 7:29 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote: Lou Berger wrote: Martin, Speaking as a contributor: On 9/15/2017 7:40 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote: Robert Wilton wrote: On 15/09/2017 11:21, Ladislav Lhotka

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc7227bis-00

Martin Bjorklund writes: > Ladislav Lhotka wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I support the adoption but I propose two conceptual changes: >> >> 1. Introduce a new module name and namespace so that it is not >> necessary to carry along the deprecated baggage. If readability

Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree output

On 9/19/2017 7:29 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > Lou Berger wrote: >> Martin, >> >> Speaking as a contributor: >> >> >> On 9/15/2017 7:40 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote: >>> Robert Wilton wrote: On 15/09/2017 11:21, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > Andy Bierman

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc7227bis-00

I believe that starting a new model would cause a real pain since any model augmentations now need to augment two differnet versions of the IP model. (Actually any model references may cause extra work.) I also believe that view that NMDA is for big gear but not for small gear is not quite right.

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-04 updates

- Original Message - From: "Martin Bjorklund" Sent: Monday, September 18, 2017 8:58 AM > "t.petch" wrote: > > - Original Message - > > From: "Martin Bjorklund" > > Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2017 2:41 PM > > > > > Andy

Re: [netmod] Correction: WG adoption poll draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc7277bis-00

I support WG adoption. Thanks, Acee On 9/18/17, 3:47 PM, "netmod on behalf of Lou Berger" wrote: >The draft being polled in this thread is >draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc7277bis-00 > >Lou > >On 9/18/2017 3:15 PM, Lou Berger wrote: >> All, >> >>

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc7227bis-00

Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > Hi, > > I support the adoption but I propose two conceptual changes: > > 1. Introduce a new module name and namespace so that it is not > necessary to carry along the deprecated baggage. If readability is > the primary concern, this is IMO the way to go.

Re: [netmod] vs

Robert Wilton wrote: > > > On 18/09/2017 19:25, Andy Bierman wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Martin Bjorklund > > wrote: > > > > Juergen Schoenwaelder >

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc7227bis-00

Hi, I support the adoption but I propose two conceptual changes: 1. Introduce a new module name and namespace so that it is not necessary to carry along the deprecated baggage. If readability is the primary concern, this is IMO the way to go. Instead of "ietf-ip-2", I'd suggest something like

Re: [netmod] vs

On 18/09/2017 19:25, Andy Bierman wrote: On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Martin Bjorklund > wrote: Juergen Schoenwaelder > wrote: > On Mon, Sep 18,

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc7223bis-00 (resend)

Support. I have reviewed this document. Thanks, Rob On 18/09/2017 19:29, Lou Berger wrote: All, This is start of a two week poll on making draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc7223bis-00 a working group document. Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support". If

Re: [netmod] Correction: WG adoption poll draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc7277bis-00

support. I have reviewed this document. Thanks, Rob On 18/09/2017 20:47, Lou Berger wrote: The draft being polled in this thread is draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc7277bis-00 Lou On 9/18/2017 3:15 PM, Lou Berger wrote: All, This is start of a two week poll on making