Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree output

To a user of the schema-mount, it is important to be able to visualize all key elements of the mounting mechanism: mount-point, mounted schema module, and parent-reference. The details can be worked out, but if any of these elements were not useful in the presentation, it would be questionable

Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree output

"Acee Lindem (acee)" wrote: > Martin, Lada, et al, > > While I don’t think we need additional annotations that Joe had prototyped > (at least not as the default), I strongly believe we need to keep the ‘@‘ > and ‘/‘ in the tree output for schema mount. Can you explain what

Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-acee-netmod-rfc8022bis-02

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. Thanks, Yingzhen -Original Message- From: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:a...@cisco.com] Sent: Monday, September 18, 2017 6:56 AM To: Lou Berger ; Ladislav Lhotka ; Yingzhen Qu

Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree output

Martin, Lada, et al, While I don’t think we need additional annotations that Joe had prototyped (at least not as the default), I strongly believe we need to keep the ‘@‘ and ‘/‘ in the tree output for schema mount. While the former enhancement provided details, the schema mount tree designations

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc7227bis-00

Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > Martin Bjorklund píše v Po 25. 09. 2017 v 11:57 +0200: > > Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > > Robert Wilton píše v Čt 21. 09. 2017 v 10:38 +0100: > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > Yes, I agree that this scenario is very likely, but I think that the

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc7227bis-00

Martin Bjorklund píše v Po 25. 09. 2017 v 11:57 +0200: > Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > Robert Wilton píše v Čt 21. 09. 2017 v 10:38 +0100: > > > [...] > > > > Yes, I agree that this scenario is very likely, but I think that the > > > > solution here is just to not mark the leaf