[netmod] netmod - Requested sessions have been scheduled for IETF 100

2017-10-20 Thread "IETF Secretariat"
Dear Lou Berger, The session(s) that you have requested have been scheduled. Below is the scheduled session information followed by the original request. netmod Session 1 (1:30:00) Wednesday, Afternoon Session II 1520-1650 Room Name: Sophia size: 200

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-14

2017-10-20 Thread Mahesh Jethanandani
I am not aware of any IPRs related to the draft. Thanks. > On Oct 20, 2017, at 5:37 PM, Kent Watsen wrote: > > > All, > > This starts a two-week working group last call on > draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-14. > > The working group last call ends on November 3. > Please

[netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-07

2017-10-20 Thread Kent Watsen
All, This starts a two-week working group last call on draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-07. The working group last call ends on November 3. Please send your comments to the netmod mailing list. Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document and believe it is ready for publication", are

[netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-14

2017-10-20 Thread Kent Watsen
All, This starts a two-week working group last call on draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-14. The working group last call ends on November 3. Please send your comments to the netmod mailing list. Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document and believe it is ready for publication", are

Re: [netmod] XPath node type tests

2017-10-20 Thread Andy Bierman
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 9:24 AM, Robert Wilton wrote: > Hi Lada, > > Thanks for the explanation, that makes sense. > > > On 20/10/2017 16:27, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > >> Hi Rob, >> >> Robert Wilton writes: >> >> Hi, >>> >>> XPATH 1.0 defines the following

Re: [netmod] XPath node type tests

2017-10-20 Thread Robert Wilton
Hi Lada, Thanks for the explanation, that makes sense. On 20/10/2017 16:27, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: Hi Rob, Robert Wilton writes: Hi, XPATH 1.0 defines the following three node-type tests: 1) comment() 2) processing-instruction() 3) text() For completeness, node() is

Re: [netmod] XPath node type tests

2017-10-20 Thread Ladislav Lhotka
Hi Rob, Robert Wilton writes: > Hi, > > XPATH 1.0 defines the following three node-type tests: > > 1) comment() > 2) processing-instruction() > 3) text() For completeness, node() is the fourth one. > > My assumption is that a YANG tree doesn't contain any nodes of type >

Re: [netmod] Updated version of NMDA Datastores draft with WG LC comments addressed.

2017-10-20 Thread Lou Berger
Rob/Authors/All, Thank you for putting in the effort to update the draft based on LC comments received. Please let the WG know when you think all open issues are addressed and we will do a 1 or 2 week 2nd LC depending on timing relative to IETF100 WG, Please don't wait for the 2nd LC -- review

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-14

2017-10-20 Thread Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
Regarding validation, section 3.10 refers to pyang tool. Since the set of tools might change in the future, shouldn't the reference be to the yangvalidator url or something along those lines (instead of an exhaustive list which may change)? I think there is a nit in section 2.4, the '.' after

[netmod] XPath node type tests

2017-10-20 Thread Robert Wilton
Hi, XPATH 1.0 defines the following three node-type tests: 1) comment() 2) processing-instruction() 3) text() My assumption is that a YANG tree doesn't contain any nodes of type 'comment' or 'processing-instruction' and hence these filters would never match any nodes. However, it wasn't

[netmod] Clarification wanted regarding applicability of YANG 1.1 issues list to YANG 1.0 implementations

2017-10-20 Thread Ivory, William
Hi, I've asked about evaluating must statements on unconfigured non-presence containers here before, but realise I never got a definitive answer on whether the clarification in the YANG 1.1 issues list actually applies to YANG 1.0, or only YANG 1.1: YANG 1.0 XPATH context:

[netmod] Updated version of NMDA Datastores draft with WG LC comments addressed.

2017-10-20 Thread Robert Wilton
Hi, I've just posted an updated version of the NMDA datastores draft (draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-05.txt).  The authors believe that this should address all of the issues raised during the WG LC.  The issues themselves have been tracked at

[netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-05.txt

2017-10-20 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Network Modeling WG of the IETF. Title : Network Management Datastore Architecture Authors : Martin Bjorklund Juergen